In his paper, Professor Pauwelyn argues that pursuant to Article 31(3)(c) of the Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties (Vienna Convention), the Appellate Body should consider other rules of international law in the interpretation of the WTO Agreements, when that law reflects the common intentions of the parties to the WTO. He argues that this does not mean that all the parties to the WTO treaty must have formally and explicitly agreed, one after the other, to the new non-WTO rule; nor even that this rule must be otherwise legally bind all WTO members; but rather, that this new rule can be said to be at least implicitly accepted or tolerated by all WTO members, in the sense that it can reasonably be considered to express the common int...
The limits of international trade must be understood within the context of the institutional framewo...
Joost Pauwelyn has written an extensive and thought-provoking treatise on the interaction of norms i...
Presented at Palma Workshop, 20-21 May 2005, on Unity and Fragmentation in International Law
In his paper, Professor Pauwelyn argues that pursuant to Article 31(3)(c) of the Vienna Convention o...
Presented at the University of Tuebingen, 14-16 October 2004 Conference on Changing Patterns of Aut...
International trade law is overwhelmingly treaty-based. In the traditional sense of ‘sources of law’...
One view of obligations under the WTO Agreement is that they are bilateral, that is, they involve le...
Like a number of international treaties, provisions of WTO Agreements are subject to ambiguities an...
Article IX:2 of the Agreement Establishing the World Trade Organization is a provision of ‘high pote...
International law is central to the interpretation of both of the Brexit-related treaties. The TCA e...
In this incisive book, Petros C. Mavroidis examines the complex practice of interpreting the various...
What role do the rules of interpretation in Articles 31 and 32 of the Vienna Convention on the Law o...
The creation of the World Trade Organization in 1994 has left open the question of whether we can id...
In four further parts of this comment, I undertake to fulfill my obligation to present a more thor...
In the practice of modern international law, if a certain understanding is advanced as the correct i...
The limits of international trade must be understood within the context of the institutional framewo...
Joost Pauwelyn has written an extensive and thought-provoking treatise on the interaction of norms i...
Presented at Palma Workshop, 20-21 May 2005, on Unity and Fragmentation in International Law
In his paper, Professor Pauwelyn argues that pursuant to Article 31(3)(c) of the Vienna Convention o...
Presented at the University of Tuebingen, 14-16 October 2004 Conference on Changing Patterns of Aut...
International trade law is overwhelmingly treaty-based. In the traditional sense of ‘sources of law’...
One view of obligations under the WTO Agreement is that they are bilateral, that is, they involve le...
Like a number of international treaties, provisions of WTO Agreements are subject to ambiguities an...
Article IX:2 of the Agreement Establishing the World Trade Organization is a provision of ‘high pote...
International law is central to the interpretation of both of the Brexit-related treaties. The TCA e...
In this incisive book, Petros C. Mavroidis examines the complex practice of interpreting the various...
What role do the rules of interpretation in Articles 31 and 32 of the Vienna Convention on the Law o...
The creation of the World Trade Organization in 1994 has left open the question of whether we can id...
In four further parts of this comment, I undertake to fulfill my obligation to present a more thor...
In the practice of modern international law, if a certain understanding is advanced as the correct i...
The limits of international trade must be understood within the context of the institutional framewo...
Joost Pauwelyn has written an extensive and thought-provoking treatise on the interaction of norms i...
Presented at Palma Workshop, 20-21 May 2005, on Unity and Fragmentation in International Law