Add to ORKGThis Article explores and assesses the Israeli justification for Operation Change Direction. Did the law of self-defense provide a basis for the operation? If so, defense against whom-Hezbollah, the State of Lebanon, or both? Were the Israeli actions consistent with the criteria for a lawful defensive action: necessity, proportionality, and immediacy? Did Operation Change Direction unlawfully breach Lebanese territorial integrity
A review of Israel’s sometimes controversial positions on targeting law within the law of armed conf...
The majority of declarations by States at the UN Security Council have stated that Israel had a “ ri...
abstract: The purpose of this paper is to analyze how Israel justifies its use of targeted killings....
This Article explores and assesses the Israeli justification for Operation Change Direction. Did the...
This Article explores and assesses the Israeli justification for Operation Change Direction. Did the...
During the escalation of the conflict between Israel and Hezbollah, the U.N. Security Council interv...
The present Article examines the legality of Israel's military intervention in Lebanon in the summer...
The 2006 Israel's military attack on Lebanon raises numerous issues concerning 'jus ad bellum' and '...
The 2006 Israel’s military attack on Lebanon raises numerous issues concerning ‘jus ad bellum’ and ‘...
The extensive air strikes launched by Israel on Iranian forces and assets across Syria in the early ...
Explores the opposing opinions of the Israeli Supreme Court & the International Court of Justice (IC...
The 2006 conflict between Hezbollah and Israel questions an important, yet unclear part of internati...
The Israel occupation of Palestinian territory has been an old aged occupation that frequently draw...
This Article examines a unique experiment in international law. In April 1996, Israel and Lebanon pu...
In the morning of 12 July 2006 Hezbollah employed missiles, mortars and snipers in southern Lebanon...
A review of Israel’s sometimes controversial positions on targeting law within the law of armed conf...
The majority of declarations by States at the UN Security Council have stated that Israel had a “ ri...
abstract: The purpose of this paper is to analyze how Israel justifies its use of targeted killings....
This Article explores and assesses the Israeli justification for Operation Change Direction. Did the...
This Article explores and assesses the Israeli justification for Operation Change Direction. Did the...
During the escalation of the conflict between Israel and Hezbollah, the U.N. Security Council interv...
The present Article examines the legality of Israel's military intervention in Lebanon in the summer...
The 2006 Israel's military attack on Lebanon raises numerous issues concerning 'jus ad bellum' and '...
The 2006 Israel’s military attack on Lebanon raises numerous issues concerning ‘jus ad bellum’ and ‘...
The extensive air strikes launched by Israel on Iranian forces and assets across Syria in the early ...
Explores the opposing opinions of the Israeli Supreme Court & the International Court of Justice (IC...
The 2006 conflict between Hezbollah and Israel questions an important, yet unclear part of internati...
The Israel occupation of Palestinian territory has been an old aged occupation that frequently draw...
This Article examines a unique experiment in international law. In April 1996, Israel and Lebanon pu...
In the morning of 12 July 2006 Hezbollah employed missiles, mortars and snipers in southern Lebanon...
A review of Israel’s sometimes controversial positions on targeting law within the law of armed conf...
The majority of declarations by States at the UN Security Council have stated that Israel had a “ ri...
abstract: The purpose of this paper is to analyze how Israel justifies its use of targeted killings....