The underlying principle of the Michigan Civil Rights Initiative (MCRI), adopted by state wide vote on 7 November 2006, is identical to that of the Civil Rights Act of 1964. Section 601 of the Civil Rights Act provides: “No person in the United States shall, on the ground of race, color, or national origin, be excluded from participation in, be denied the benefits of, or be subjected to discrimination under any program or activity receiving Federal financial assistance.” The recent passage of the MCRI results now in the inclusion [in Article 1, Section 26 of the Michigan constitution] of section (2), which provides: “The state shall not discriminate against, or grant preferential treatment to any individual or group on the basis of race, se...
This report provides information about a primer on Federal Civil Rights Statutes. it also provides a...
Part I of this Note explains the development of· the current state of handicappers\u27 civil rights ...
What is the nature of the “rights,” jurisprudentially, that the 1964 Civil Rights Act legally prescr...
The underlying principle of the Michigan Civil Rights Initiative (MCRI), adopted by state wide vote ...
The Civil Rights Act of 1964 (42 U.S. C.A.) (the 19 Act) likely has had the greatest transformative ...
It is the purpose of this comment to note the nature of the prior legislation in the civil rights ar...
The Civil Rights Act of 1964 [1] represented a seminal legislative accomplishment of the twentieth c...
The Civil Rights Act of 1964 was an extraordinary achievement of law, politics, and human rights. On...
Under the following statute, civil rights groups, with the approval of the state civil rights commis...
Professor Johnson mentioned that the Voting Rights Act is often seen as the most successful piece of...
Constitutional history from the 1857 Dred Scott decision to the 1954 Brown decision records a movem...
The University of Michigan has long been a place of important discussions about civil and human righ...
The Michigan Civil Rights Initiative (“MCRI”) amended the Michigan Constitution to provide that publ...
The thesis of this article is that the Attorney General has misread the language and actions of the ...
When the Civil Rights Act of 1964 became law the Johnson Administration had ample reason to worry th...
This report provides information about a primer on Federal Civil Rights Statutes. it also provides a...
Part I of this Note explains the development of· the current state of handicappers\u27 civil rights ...
What is the nature of the “rights,” jurisprudentially, that the 1964 Civil Rights Act legally prescr...
The underlying principle of the Michigan Civil Rights Initiative (MCRI), adopted by state wide vote ...
The Civil Rights Act of 1964 (42 U.S. C.A.) (the 19 Act) likely has had the greatest transformative ...
It is the purpose of this comment to note the nature of the prior legislation in the civil rights ar...
The Civil Rights Act of 1964 [1] represented a seminal legislative accomplishment of the twentieth c...
The Civil Rights Act of 1964 was an extraordinary achievement of law, politics, and human rights. On...
Under the following statute, civil rights groups, with the approval of the state civil rights commis...
Professor Johnson mentioned that the Voting Rights Act is often seen as the most successful piece of...
Constitutional history from the 1857 Dred Scott decision to the 1954 Brown decision records a movem...
The University of Michigan has long been a place of important discussions about civil and human righ...
The Michigan Civil Rights Initiative (“MCRI”) amended the Michigan Constitution to provide that publ...
The thesis of this article is that the Attorney General has misread the language and actions of the ...
When the Civil Rights Act of 1964 became law the Johnson Administration had ample reason to worry th...
This report provides information about a primer on Federal Civil Rights Statutes. it also provides a...
Part I of this Note explains the development of· the current state of handicappers\u27 civil rights ...
What is the nature of the “rights,” jurisprudentially, that the 1964 Civil Rights Act legally prescr...