Add to ORKGPart I of this paper examines the reasons underlying queer rights advocates\u27 reluctance to insert privacy arguments into the case for legalizing same-sex marriage. Part II illustrates that, due to such disinclination, advocates transformed notions of privacy into concepts of liberty. Part III argues that, after the Lawrence decision, proponents of same-sex marriage can and should use privacy-based arguments to fortify their claims
In an effort to reconcile the inconsistency between liberal ideals and inequitable adjudication of m...
In the United States, both constitutional law and tort law recognize the right to privacy, understoo...
Same-sex marriage is a hotly contentious legal issue, and, unlike any other time before, the stakes ...
Part I of this paper examines the reasons underlying queer rights advocates\u27 reluctance to insert...
Does the fundamental right to marry obligate the state to make the institution of marriage available...
This article takes a critical, historical view of the LGBT rights movement in three related areas: m...
We are about to mark the fiftieth anniversary of Griswold v. Connecticut, a 1965 case in which the S...
We are about to mark the fiftieth anniversary of Griswold v. Connecticut, a 1965 case in which the S...
Article published in the Michigan State University School of Law Student Scholarship Collection
Unrepresented in the literature on same-sex marriage is the perspective of a family law scholar who ...
Many of the states of the United States have statutes, constitutional provisions, and court decision...
In the United States, both constitutional law and tort law recognize the right to privacy, understoo...
Same-sex marriage is now a reality across Western countries. While this was a positive achievement f...
In Lawrence v. Texas (2003), the U.S. Supreme Court recognized a right to choose homosexual relation...
This Article critiques the Supreme Court\u27s decision in Bowers v. Hardwick. The author examines th...
In an effort to reconcile the inconsistency between liberal ideals and inequitable adjudication of m...
In the United States, both constitutional law and tort law recognize the right to privacy, understoo...
Same-sex marriage is a hotly contentious legal issue, and, unlike any other time before, the stakes ...
Part I of this paper examines the reasons underlying queer rights advocates\u27 reluctance to insert...
Does the fundamental right to marry obligate the state to make the institution of marriage available...
This article takes a critical, historical view of the LGBT rights movement in three related areas: m...
We are about to mark the fiftieth anniversary of Griswold v. Connecticut, a 1965 case in which the S...
We are about to mark the fiftieth anniversary of Griswold v. Connecticut, a 1965 case in which the S...
Article published in the Michigan State University School of Law Student Scholarship Collection
Unrepresented in the literature on same-sex marriage is the perspective of a family law scholar who ...
Many of the states of the United States have statutes, constitutional provisions, and court decision...
In the United States, both constitutional law and tort law recognize the right to privacy, understoo...
Same-sex marriage is now a reality across Western countries. While this was a positive achievement f...
In Lawrence v. Texas (2003), the U.S. Supreme Court recognized a right to choose homosexual relation...
This Article critiques the Supreme Court\u27s decision in Bowers v. Hardwick. The author examines th...
In an effort to reconcile the inconsistency between liberal ideals and inequitable adjudication of m...
In the United States, both constitutional law and tort law recognize the right to privacy, understoo...
Same-sex marriage is a hotly contentious legal issue, and, unlike any other time before, the stakes ...