Add to ORKGThe Supreme Court\u27s decision in Ricci v. DeStefano foregrounded the question of whether Title VIl\u27s disparate impact standard conflicts with equal protection. This Article shows that there are three ways to read Ricci, one of which is likely fatal to disparate impact doctrine but the other two of which are not
More than four decades ago, the Supreme Court concluded that Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 19...
This study employs various statistical techniques to test the efficacy of the 1991 Civil Rights Act ...
This Article, Disparately Seeking Jurors: Disparate Impact and the (Mis)use of Batson, uncovers a ...
The Supreme Court\u27s decision in Ricci v. DeStefano foregrounded the question of whether Title VIl...
As Professor Richard Primus noted in his article, Equal Protection and Disparate Impact: Round Three...
The Ricci case, where White firefighters challenged the constitutionality of disparate impact, neatl...
Six years ago, Ricci v. DeStefano foregrounded the possibility that statutory disparate-impact stand...
Federal law has long prohibited not just intentional discrimination by employers, but also practices...
Ricci v. DeStefano, the New Haven firefighters case, raised questions about the constitutionality of...
Reports of the death of Title VII’s disparate impact theory of discrimination in the wake of Ricci v...
This Article examines the history of Title VII disparate impact law in light of the policy and poten...
When the Supreme Court in 1971 first recognized disparate impact as a legal theory under Title VII, ...
Justice Scalia’s concurring opinion in Ricci v. DeStefano highlighted severe conceptual tensions bet...
Prior inquiries into the relationship between equal protection and disparate impact have focused on ...
At least since the Supreme Court’s 2009 decision in Ricci v. DeStefano, disparate-impact liability h...
More than four decades ago, the Supreme Court concluded that Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 19...
This study employs various statistical techniques to test the efficacy of the 1991 Civil Rights Act ...
This Article, Disparately Seeking Jurors: Disparate Impact and the (Mis)use of Batson, uncovers a ...
The Supreme Court\u27s decision in Ricci v. DeStefano foregrounded the question of whether Title VIl...
As Professor Richard Primus noted in his article, Equal Protection and Disparate Impact: Round Three...
The Ricci case, where White firefighters challenged the constitutionality of disparate impact, neatl...
Six years ago, Ricci v. DeStefano foregrounded the possibility that statutory disparate-impact stand...
Federal law has long prohibited not just intentional discrimination by employers, but also practices...
Ricci v. DeStefano, the New Haven firefighters case, raised questions about the constitutionality of...
Reports of the death of Title VII’s disparate impact theory of discrimination in the wake of Ricci v...
This Article examines the history of Title VII disparate impact law in light of the policy and poten...
When the Supreme Court in 1971 first recognized disparate impact as a legal theory under Title VII, ...
Justice Scalia’s concurring opinion in Ricci v. DeStefano highlighted severe conceptual tensions bet...
Prior inquiries into the relationship between equal protection and disparate impact have focused on ...
At least since the Supreme Court’s 2009 decision in Ricci v. DeStefano, disparate-impact liability h...
More than four decades ago, the Supreme Court concluded that Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 19...
This study employs various statistical techniques to test the efficacy of the 1991 Civil Rights Act ...
This Article, Disparately Seeking Jurors: Disparate Impact and the (Mis)use of Batson, uncovers a ...