The rapid pace of constitutional change during the past decade has blunted our capacity for surprise at Supreme Court decisions. Nevertheless, Powell v. McCormack is a surprising decision. Avoidance of politically explosive controversies was not one of the most notable characteristics of the Warren Court. And yet, it is one thing for the Court to do battle with the Congress in the service of important practical ends or when the necessity of doing so is thrust upon it by the need to discharge its traditional responsibilities. It is quite another to tilt at windmills, especially at a time when the Court\u27s supply of lances is not overly large
Although Americans usually associate the significant events of their political history with the cont...
The recent growth in the importance and apparent power of the Supreme Court has been one result of o...
In 1924, Plank Five of the Platform of the Independent candidate for President proposed a constituti...
The rapid pace of constitutional change during the past decade has blunted our capacity for surprise...
Powell v. McCormack is an unfortunate decision, principally because the Supreme Court should never h...
In recent years, we have come to expect the debate over Supreme Court nominations to reflect ideolog...
The legal opinions of Earl Warren were not such as to see the development of a well-grounded constit...
The Supreme Court, reads a famous passage by Bryce, feels the touch of public opinion. Opinion is s...
Mr. Justice Powell has publicly characterized the 1974 Term of the Supreme. Court as a dull one. W...
Perhaps the principal shortcoming of constitutional adjudication in the Supreme Court of the United ...
In the Comment which follows Professor Baldwin presents a brief for an extremely creative Supreme Co...
Since the fall of 1969 when Warren Earl Burger took his seat as Chief Justice, the academic communit...
In dissenting from the decision of the Supreme Court in a celebrated administrative-law case, Justic...
Despite all that has been written about the bitter struggle initiated by President Reagan\u27s nomin...
Given this welcome opportunity to comment on the Levine and Wermiel account, I thought I would use i...
Although Americans usually associate the significant events of their political history with the cont...
The recent growth in the importance and apparent power of the Supreme Court has been one result of o...
In 1924, Plank Five of the Platform of the Independent candidate for President proposed a constituti...
The rapid pace of constitutional change during the past decade has blunted our capacity for surprise...
Powell v. McCormack is an unfortunate decision, principally because the Supreme Court should never h...
In recent years, we have come to expect the debate over Supreme Court nominations to reflect ideolog...
The legal opinions of Earl Warren were not such as to see the development of a well-grounded constit...
The Supreme Court, reads a famous passage by Bryce, feels the touch of public opinion. Opinion is s...
Mr. Justice Powell has publicly characterized the 1974 Term of the Supreme. Court as a dull one. W...
Perhaps the principal shortcoming of constitutional adjudication in the Supreme Court of the United ...
In the Comment which follows Professor Baldwin presents a brief for an extremely creative Supreme Co...
Since the fall of 1969 when Warren Earl Burger took his seat as Chief Justice, the academic communit...
In dissenting from the decision of the Supreme Court in a celebrated administrative-law case, Justic...
Despite all that has been written about the bitter struggle initiated by President Reagan\u27s nomin...
Given this welcome opportunity to comment on the Levine and Wermiel account, I thought I would use i...
Although Americans usually associate the significant events of their political history with the cont...
The recent growth in the importance and apparent power of the Supreme Court has been one result of o...
In 1924, Plank Five of the Platform of the Independent candidate for President proposed a constituti...