The first major empirical challenge to racial discrimination in the use of the death penalty in the United States was presented in federal court in the case of William L. Maxwell, who was sentenced to death in Arkansas in 1962 for the crime of rape.1 It was based on a landmark study by Marvin Wolfgang, a distinguished criminologist who had collected data on some 3000 rape convictions from 1945 through 1965 in selected counties across eleven southern states.2 He found that black men who were convicted of rape were seven times more likely to be sentenced to death than white men, and that black men who were convicted of raping white women were eighteen times more likely to be sentenced to death than men convicted of rape in any other racial co...
This Symposium, Pursuing Racial Fairness in the Administration of Justice: Twenty Years After McCl...
In McCleskey v. Kemp, the Supreme Court refused to accept statistical evidence of race discriminatio...
In the forty year history of the Supreme Court\u27s modern death penalty jurisprudence, two cases — ...
Racial discrimination plays a role in the administration of the death penalty. This research analyze...
An analysis of the grave errs embodied in the Supreme Court’s McCleskey v. Kemp decision, specifical...
McCleskey v. Kemp is without doubt a memorable case. Professor David C. Baldus and his colleagues, C...
The litigation campaign that led to McCleskey v. Kemp did not begin as an anti-death-penalty effort....
In federal habeas corpus proceedings, Earl Matthews, an African American, South Carolina death row i...
Justice Thurgood Marshall: Exploring the Life and Legacy of One of America\u27s Most Celebrated Juri...
The intense media coverage of the United States Supreme Court\u27s recent decisions in Baze v. Rees\...
21 p.Presented at the Wayne Morse Center for Law and Politics Symposium: The Law and Politics of the...
Dozens of researchers have examined legal and extralegal factors that make criminal defendants more ...
This Article presents evidence of racial discrimination in the administration of the death penalty i...
McCleskey v. Kemp, the case that upheld the death penalty despite undeniable evidence of its raciall...
Capital punishment in this country, and in South Carolina, has its roots in racial subjugation, ster...
This Symposium, Pursuing Racial Fairness in the Administration of Justice: Twenty Years After McCl...
In McCleskey v. Kemp, the Supreme Court refused to accept statistical evidence of race discriminatio...
In the forty year history of the Supreme Court\u27s modern death penalty jurisprudence, two cases — ...
Racial discrimination plays a role in the administration of the death penalty. This research analyze...
An analysis of the grave errs embodied in the Supreme Court’s McCleskey v. Kemp decision, specifical...
McCleskey v. Kemp is without doubt a memorable case. Professor David C. Baldus and his colleagues, C...
The litigation campaign that led to McCleskey v. Kemp did not begin as an anti-death-penalty effort....
In federal habeas corpus proceedings, Earl Matthews, an African American, South Carolina death row i...
Justice Thurgood Marshall: Exploring the Life and Legacy of One of America\u27s Most Celebrated Juri...
The intense media coverage of the United States Supreme Court\u27s recent decisions in Baze v. Rees\...
21 p.Presented at the Wayne Morse Center for Law and Politics Symposium: The Law and Politics of the...
Dozens of researchers have examined legal and extralegal factors that make criminal defendants more ...
This Article presents evidence of racial discrimination in the administration of the death penalty i...
McCleskey v. Kemp, the case that upheld the death penalty despite undeniable evidence of its raciall...
Capital punishment in this country, and in South Carolina, has its roots in racial subjugation, ster...
This Symposium, Pursuing Racial Fairness in the Administration of Justice: Twenty Years After McCl...
In McCleskey v. Kemp, the Supreme Court refused to accept statistical evidence of race discriminatio...
In the forty year history of the Supreme Court\u27s modern death penalty jurisprudence, two cases — ...