Add to ORKGThis comment will first address the historical trend leading to the liability of social hosts. It will then address the three ways an injured victim might allege a cause of action, and will discuss the problems and implications of holdings of liability of each theory
Under the traditional view of the common law, drinking alcohol rather than providing alcohol acted a...
This Perspective evaluates the contradiction created by the Texas Supreme Court in Smith v. Merritt ...
This Note argues that the current voluntary intoxication defense to the intentional injury exclusion...
Gradually, courts have joined these efforts to alleviate the harm caused by the intoxicated driver. ...
Alcohol is a contributing factor in traffic crash fatalities involving young drivers. A number of st...
In Hansen v. Friend, the Washington Supreme Court held that a host who furnishes alcohol to a minor ...
This Note will first trace the development of social host liability in North Carolina and in other j...
The Liability of Purveyors of Alcoholic Beverages for Torts of Intoxicated Consumer
Following the repeal of the Missouri Dramshop Act in 1934, Missouri courts did not recognize a civil...
In Klein v. Raysinger the Pennsylvania Supreme Court denied social host liability for the serving of...
The country is experiencing a trend of alcohol server liability law suits resulting from dram shop s...
An intoxicated person behind the wheel of an automobile can be as dangerous as an insane person with...
The Act establishes that servers of alcoholic beverages shall be liable for the acts of certain into...
The Supreme Court of Pennsylvania held that there is no liability when a minor furnishes alcohol to ...
Persons under the influence of liquor or drugs are known to be irrational, uncoordinated, erratic an...
Under the traditional view of the common law, drinking alcohol rather than providing alcohol acted a...
This Perspective evaluates the contradiction created by the Texas Supreme Court in Smith v. Merritt ...
This Note argues that the current voluntary intoxication defense to the intentional injury exclusion...
Gradually, courts have joined these efforts to alleviate the harm caused by the intoxicated driver. ...
Alcohol is a contributing factor in traffic crash fatalities involving young drivers. A number of st...
In Hansen v. Friend, the Washington Supreme Court held that a host who furnishes alcohol to a minor ...
This Note will first trace the development of social host liability in North Carolina and in other j...
The Liability of Purveyors of Alcoholic Beverages for Torts of Intoxicated Consumer
Following the repeal of the Missouri Dramshop Act in 1934, Missouri courts did not recognize a civil...
In Klein v. Raysinger the Pennsylvania Supreme Court denied social host liability for the serving of...
The country is experiencing a trend of alcohol server liability law suits resulting from dram shop s...
An intoxicated person behind the wheel of an automobile can be as dangerous as an insane person with...
The Act establishes that servers of alcoholic beverages shall be liable for the acts of certain into...
The Supreme Court of Pennsylvania held that there is no liability when a minor furnishes alcohol to ...
Persons under the influence of liquor or drugs are known to be irrational, uncoordinated, erratic an...
Under the traditional view of the common law, drinking alcohol rather than providing alcohol acted a...
This Perspective evaluates the contradiction created by the Texas Supreme Court in Smith v. Merritt ...
This Note argues that the current voluntary intoxication defense to the intentional injury exclusion...