Add to ORKGThis comment outlines the law in Ohio concerning court-appointed representation of indigent defendants in capital offense cases. A brief look at Ohio\u27s pre-C.P.Sup.R. 65 period provides the proper backdrop in which to examine C.P.Sup.R. 65\u27s relation to the Ohio Public Defender\u27s Regulations and the impact this rule may have throughout the State
Beginning with recapitulation of the quest for the meaning and scope of the eighth amendment, this c...
Having briefly outlined the history of the formal development of the Act, it is the purpose of this ...
When the United States Supreme Court approved the reinstatement of the death penalty in the United S...
The state of Ohio enacted a new death penalty statute which became effective October 19, 1981. As of...
The State of Ohio\u27s brief in support of its demand for a jury trial. The brief provides a short p...
“The high service rendered by the \u27cruel and unusual\u27 punishment clause of the Eighth Amendmen...
While Ohio’s Rules of Criminal Procedure, effective July 1, 1973, are entirely new to the criminal l...
During the 1981-1982 term the Ohio Supreme Court rendered 250 written opinions on a wide range of to...
The State of Ohio\u27s argument that the claim for wrongful imprisonment should not be attached to t...
The article discusses the history of the capital punishment (CP) laws and litigation in Ohio as of 2...
This article presents first an overview of the national legal environment and actual executions in A...
The State of Ohio’s brief in response to the Estate of Sam Sheppard’s opposition to having a jury tr...
This article explores and analyzes the two-pronged legal dilemma that confronted the court in State ...
Attorney Carlson surveyed Iowa for the American Bar Association\u27s study of the defense of indigen...
The State’s proposed jury instructions focused primarily on the difference between the burden of pro...
Beginning with recapitulation of the quest for the meaning and scope of the eighth amendment, this c...
Having briefly outlined the history of the formal development of the Act, it is the purpose of this ...
When the United States Supreme Court approved the reinstatement of the death penalty in the United S...
The state of Ohio enacted a new death penalty statute which became effective October 19, 1981. As of...
The State of Ohio\u27s brief in support of its demand for a jury trial. The brief provides a short p...
“The high service rendered by the \u27cruel and unusual\u27 punishment clause of the Eighth Amendmen...
While Ohio’s Rules of Criminal Procedure, effective July 1, 1973, are entirely new to the criminal l...
During the 1981-1982 term the Ohio Supreme Court rendered 250 written opinions on a wide range of to...
The State of Ohio\u27s argument that the claim for wrongful imprisonment should not be attached to t...
The article discusses the history of the capital punishment (CP) laws and litigation in Ohio as of 2...
This article presents first an overview of the national legal environment and actual executions in A...
The State of Ohio’s brief in response to the Estate of Sam Sheppard’s opposition to having a jury tr...
This article explores and analyzes the two-pronged legal dilemma that confronted the court in State ...
Attorney Carlson surveyed Iowa for the American Bar Association\u27s study of the defense of indigen...
The State’s proposed jury instructions focused primarily on the difference between the burden of pro...
Beginning with recapitulation of the quest for the meaning and scope of the eighth amendment, this c...
Having briefly outlined the history of the formal development of the Act, it is the purpose of this ...
When the United States Supreme Court approved the reinstatement of the death penalty in the United S...