Add to ORKGPosit: What role should the common law of evidence play in a military judge\u27s decisions under the present rules of evidence? My conclusion is that the answer to this question is of bedrock importance to military justice. Yet despite these differences, an understanding of the Federal Rules of Evidence and the common law precedents from which they evolved is imperative if the majority of the military rules is to be properly employed
Many fields of law can today be described as fluid and fast-changing. Military law, however, would s...
The judicial rules of Evidence, said their great expounder, were never meant to be an indirect proc...
I. To. United States Courts. 2. To State Courts. 3. To Military Courts. General Principles of Amenab...
The purpose of this study is to analyze certain major reforms in the Code in an effort to determine ...
Independence of the military justice system is predicated on the premise that courts-martial are Art...
Although pretrial litigation often seems to render trial on the merits something of an anti-climax, ...
Since at least the seventeenth century, courts have required that confessions or admissions be corro...
Military law is the law which governs members of the Armed Services and, to some extent, the relatio...
There is often a misconception regarding the military and the procedures that it uses in order to br...
The thesis of this Article is that most of the vices infesting the military appellate system could b...
In the Manual for Courts-Martial, the President of the United States has established the procedural,...
On 2 June 1969, a majority of the Supreme Court of the United States in O\u27Callahan v. Parker deci...
During court-martial, the commander decides on the charge, selects of the jury, and reviews the tria...
In recent litigation before U.S. federal courts, the government has argued that military commissions...
The Kentucky Rules of Evidence, which became effective on July 1, 1992, dramatically transformed the...
Many fields of law can today be described as fluid and fast-changing. Military law, however, would s...
The judicial rules of Evidence, said their great expounder, were never meant to be an indirect proc...
I. To. United States Courts. 2. To State Courts. 3. To Military Courts. General Principles of Amenab...
The purpose of this study is to analyze certain major reforms in the Code in an effort to determine ...
Independence of the military justice system is predicated on the premise that courts-martial are Art...
Although pretrial litigation often seems to render trial on the merits something of an anti-climax, ...
Since at least the seventeenth century, courts have required that confessions or admissions be corro...
Military law is the law which governs members of the Armed Services and, to some extent, the relatio...
There is often a misconception regarding the military and the procedures that it uses in order to br...
The thesis of this Article is that most of the vices infesting the military appellate system could b...
In the Manual for Courts-Martial, the President of the United States has established the procedural,...
On 2 June 1969, a majority of the Supreme Court of the United States in O\u27Callahan v. Parker deci...
During court-martial, the commander decides on the charge, selects of the jury, and reviews the tria...
In recent litigation before U.S. federal courts, the government has argued that military commissions...
The Kentucky Rules of Evidence, which became effective on July 1, 1992, dramatically transformed the...
Many fields of law can today be described as fluid and fast-changing. Military law, however, would s...
The judicial rules of Evidence, said their great expounder, were never meant to be an indirect proc...
I. To. United States Courts. 2. To State Courts. 3. To Military Courts. General Principles of Amenab...