ARTICLE 1(4) of the Protocol Additional to the Geneva Conventions of 12 August 1949, and Relating to the Protection of Victims of International Armed Conflict (Protocol 1), bringing national liberation movements within the ambit of the Protocol and thus making the conflicts in which they engage international in scope, was probably the most controversial provision adopted by the Diplomatic Conference which met in Geneva from 1974 to 1977. However, Article 44, which implements Article 1(4), has been the object of almost equal controversy. The purpose of this paper is to determine whether the objections to that article were and are justified
In May 1982, the International Committee of the Red Cross negotiated an agreement that facilitates p...
The purpose of this paper is to examine the U.S. codification of its Geneva Convention obligations t...
This thesis is concerned with the controversial problem of the legal protection of civilians and pri...
There are many provisions of value to be found in the 1977 Protocol Additional to the 1949 Geneva Co...
This article examines whether a Detaining State is obliged to recognize prisoner of war status for i...
In analyzing the two 1977 Protocols additional to the Geneva Conventions for the protection of war v...
On August 12, 1949 plenipotentiaries of sixty-one nations of the world, including the United States ...
This article asserts that Captain David Graham, writing in this issue of the Washington and Lee Law ...
The motive of every war has always been to actualize socio-economic and political interest. Attendan...
First published in 7 United States Air Force Academy Journal of Legal Studies 37 (1997
In the article mentioned in the title, Douglas J. Feith, Deputy Assistant Secretary of Defense for I...
Time and space do not permit me to comment on the many worthy provisions within Protocol 1, so I hav...
The so-called war on terrorism has prompted calls for revisions to the 1949 Geneva Conventions on ar...
There is general agreement that the Hague Conventions of 1899 and 1907, while still technically in f...
The paper is premised on the idea that the future course of international law will be impacted by th...
In May 1982, the International Committee of the Red Cross negotiated an agreement that facilitates p...
The purpose of this paper is to examine the U.S. codification of its Geneva Convention obligations t...
This thesis is concerned with the controversial problem of the legal protection of civilians and pri...
There are many provisions of value to be found in the 1977 Protocol Additional to the 1949 Geneva Co...
This article examines whether a Detaining State is obliged to recognize prisoner of war status for i...
In analyzing the two 1977 Protocols additional to the Geneva Conventions for the protection of war v...
On August 12, 1949 plenipotentiaries of sixty-one nations of the world, including the United States ...
This article asserts that Captain David Graham, writing in this issue of the Washington and Lee Law ...
The motive of every war has always been to actualize socio-economic and political interest. Attendan...
First published in 7 United States Air Force Academy Journal of Legal Studies 37 (1997
In the article mentioned in the title, Douglas J. Feith, Deputy Assistant Secretary of Defense for I...
Time and space do not permit me to comment on the many worthy provisions within Protocol 1, so I hav...
The so-called war on terrorism has prompted calls for revisions to the 1949 Geneva Conventions on ar...
There is general agreement that the Hague Conventions of 1899 and 1907, while still technically in f...
The paper is premised on the idea that the future course of international law will be impacted by th...
In May 1982, the International Committee of the Red Cross negotiated an agreement that facilitates p...
The purpose of this paper is to examine the U.S. codification of its Geneva Convention obligations t...
This thesis is concerned with the controversial problem of the legal protection of civilians and pri...