The purpose of this article is to outline these policies and to discuss the threat which compliance poses to the issuer\u27s shareholders as well as the corporation law of the issuer\u27s home state. Although much of the discussion is couched in terms of Ohio law and Ohio issuers, it applies equally to other jurisdictions whose corporation laws are similar to Ohio\u27s
Many states perceive corporate takeover activity as a threat to local business and industry. The Fl...
While most regulators at both the state and federal levels espouse an attitude and philosophy of coo...
In each of the three largest economies with dispersed ownership of public companies—the United Stat...
The objective of this article is to inform the reader of what Ohio has done over the past six years ...
How far may one state go in regulating another state\u27s corporations? Traditionally, the answer to...
In a federal system in which each state may enact laws providing for the chartering and governance o...
The purpose of this article is to discuss several proposed revisions to Ohio\u27s securities laws wh...
Section 2115 of the California Corporations Code asserts control over select internal affairs of a f...
Part I of this Note describes a phenomenon of modern corporate activity first identified over fifty ...
This article examines the constitutional validity of business combination antitakeover statutes. Del...
It is often said that California sets the pace for changes in America\u27s tastes. Trends establishe...
Acquisitions of United States corporations have become increasingly complex takeover contests, where...
This Article reveals two very different lessons about state competence to regulate corporate takeove...
Systems of corporate law and securities regulation differ considerably among jurisdictions. This Art...
United States companies are offering their securities to foreign nationals in increasing numbers. Pr...
Many states perceive corporate takeover activity as a threat to local business and industry. The Fl...
While most regulators at both the state and federal levels espouse an attitude and philosophy of coo...
In each of the three largest economies with dispersed ownership of public companies—the United Stat...
The objective of this article is to inform the reader of what Ohio has done over the past six years ...
How far may one state go in regulating another state\u27s corporations? Traditionally, the answer to...
In a federal system in which each state may enact laws providing for the chartering and governance o...
The purpose of this article is to discuss several proposed revisions to Ohio\u27s securities laws wh...
Section 2115 of the California Corporations Code asserts control over select internal affairs of a f...
Part I of this Note describes a phenomenon of modern corporate activity first identified over fifty ...
This article examines the constitutional validity of business combination antitakeover statutes. Del...
It is often said that California sets the pace for changes in America\u27s tastes. Trends establishe...
Acquisitions of United States corporations have become increasingly complex takeover contests, where...
This Article reveals two very different lessons about state competence to regulate corporate takeove...
Systems of corporate law and securities regulation differ considerably among jurisdictions. This Art...
United States companies are offering their securities to foreign nationals in increasing numbers. Pr...
Many states perceive corporate takeover activity as a threat to local business and industry. The Fl...
While most regulators at both the state and federal levels espouse an attitude and philosophy of coo...
In each of the three largest economies with dispersed ownership of public companies—the United Stat...