The Uniform Partnership Act (U.P.A.) and the Uniform Limited Partnership Acts (U.L.P.A.) contain many presumptions on the mutual rights and duties of partners. These presumptions create many problems regarding the formation and modification of partnership agreements. This article concerns some of the problems. Section I discusses the issue of whose consent is necessary to rebut a presumption or modify a partnership agreement. Section II discusses the issue of what evidence is sufficient to rebut a presumption or modify a partnership agreement
In 1954, Congress enacted the first comprehensive statutory treatment of partners and partnerships i...
The contractarian and fiduciary-based positions of the Revised Uniform Partnership Act (RUPA) and th...
Marback Motor Co., a limited partnership, was formed in 1951 pursuant to the California Uniform Limi...
The Uniform Partnership Act, unchanged in over seventy years, is being considered for revision by th...
This Article addresses the decision by the drafters of the revised Uniform Partnership Act (1996) (R...
This Article is a brief overview of what the Reporters believe to be the four basic contributions of...
This Article considers several foundational questions concerning the formation of general partnershi...
This Article considers several foundational questions concerning the formation of general partnershi...
It has been “a matter of considerable dispute” whether partnership legislation should treat a genera...
This article focuses on key areas where Chapter 1776 and RUPA reflect changes in the law of partners...
As states debate the wisdom of adopting the Revised Uniform Partnership Act (the RUPA ), an area th...
The Revised Uniform Partnership Act of 1994 (RUPA) section 404 establishes a comprehensive definitio...
Many distinctive consequences of the relationship among partners stem from applicable norms of agenc...
Infinite variety is possible in the agreements by which persons unite property or services in the ho...
Purpose - To examine the nature and merits of the proposed changes to partnership law contained in t...
In 1954, Congress enacted the first comprehensive statutory treatment of partners and partnerships i...
The contractarian and fiduciary-based positions of the Revised Uniform Partnership Act (RUPA) and th...
Marback Motor Co., a limited partnership, was formed in 1951 pursuant to the California Uniform Limi...
The Uniform Partnership Act, unchanged in over seventy years, is being considered for revision by th...
This Article addresses the decision by the drafters of the revised Uniform Partnership Act (1996) (R...
This Article is a brief overview of what the Reporters believe to be the four basic contributions of...
This Article considers several foundational questions concerning the formation of general partnershi...
This Article considers several foundational questions concerning the formation of general partnershi...
It has been “a matter of considerable dispute” whether partnership legislation should treat a genera...
This article focuses on key areas where Chapter 1776 and RUPA reflect changes in the law of partners...
As states debate the wisdom of adopting the Revised Uniform Partnership Act (the RUPA ), an area th...
The Revised Uniform Partnership Act of 1994 (RUPA) section 404 establishes a comprehensive definitio...
Many distinctive consequences of the relationship among partners stem from applicable norms of agenc...
Infinite variety is possible in the agreements by which persons unite property or services in the ho...
Purpose - To examine the nature and merits of the proposed changes to partnership law contained in t...
In 1954, Congress enacted the first comprehensive statutory treatment of partners and partnerships i...
The contractarian and fiduciary-based positions of the Revised Uniform Partnership Act (RUPA) and th...
Marback Motor Co., a limited partnership, was formed in 1951 pursuant to the California Uniform Limi...