This note discusses how the Court reached the decision in Idaho v. Wright to exclude the hearsay testimony of a child abuse victim. The note examines the Court\u27s reasoning and the effects which the exclusion of hearsay testimony of child abuse victims may have on future prosecutions. The note concludes that the Court\u27s decision is likely to add chaos into the already difficult and complex arena of child abuse prosecution
In Tome v United States, for the fifth time in eight years, the Supreme Court decided a case present...
In Tome v United States, for the fifth time in eight years, the Supreme Court decided a case present...
In Tome v United States, for the fifth time in eight years, the Supreme Court decided a case present...
This note discusses the facts of Idaho v. Wright, examines the history of the admissibility of hears...
In its Spring 2004 term, the Supreme Court, in Crawford v. Washington, explicitly articulated the te...
The adjudication of child abuse claims poses an excruciatingly difficult conundrum. The crime is a t...
This Comment argues that E.S.H.B. 2809 should be recognized as an exception to the Confrontation Cla...
The adjudication of child abuse claims poses an excruciatingly difficult conundrum. In many cases, a...
This comment focuses on the Confrontation Clause\u27s interpretation throughout history and demonstr...
This Comment begins by providing a brief outline of the procedures regulating the use of televised t...
This Note proposes that those statutes which permit admission of videotaped testimony and most uses ...
Legislatures are attempting to reduce the trauma to the child, and, at the same time, to increase co...
In Maryland v. Craig, the Supreme Court held allowing child abuse victims to testify via one-way clo...
The judicial system is struggling to accommodate the special needs of a rapidly growing number of ch...
Child abuse is a public health problem affecting millions of children across the United States. Many...
In Tome v United States, for the fifth time in eight years, the Supreme Court decided a case present...
In Tome v United States, for the fifth time in eight years, the Supreme Court decided a case present...
In Tome v United States, for the fifth time in eight years, the Supreme Court decided a case present...
This note discusses the facts of Idaho v. Wright, examines the history of the admissibility of hears...
In its Spring 2004 term, the Supreme Court, in Crawford v. Washington, explicitly articulated the te...
The adjudication of child abuse claims poses an excruciatingly difficult conundrum. The crime is a t...
This Comment argues that E.S.H.B. 2809 should be recognized as an exception to the Confrontation Cla...
The adjudication of child abuse claims poses an excruciatingly difficult conundrum. In many cases, a...
This comment focuses on the Confrontation Clause\u27s interpretation throughout history and demonstr...
This Comment begins by providing a brief outline of the procedures regulating the use of televised t...
This Note proposes that those statutes which permit admission of videotaped testimony and most uses ...
Legislatures are attempting to reduce the trauma to the child, and, at the same time, to increase co...
In Maryland v. Craig, the Supreme Court held allowing child abuse victims to testify via one-way clo...
The judicial system is struggling to accommodate the special needs of a rapidly growing number of ch...
Child abuse is a public health problem affecting millions of children across the United States. Many...
In Tome v United States, for the fifth time in eight years, the Supreme Court decided a case present...
In Tome v United States, for the fifth time in eight years, the Supreme Court decided a case present...
In Tome v United States, for the fifth time in eight years, the Supreme Court decided a case present...