This Comment will review the origins of the vagrancy law and its traditional abuses. It will then examine decisions discussing the vagrancy law\u27s constitutionality under the Due Process clause void-for-vagueness doctrine and the courts\u27 attempted remedy of explicit standards as to place, scope, or purpose. The remainder of this Comment will discuss the constitutionality of these revised vagrancy laws under the Fourth Amendment\u27s prohibition of unreasonable seizures
The first section of this article considers whether the police officer\u27s intent is an indispensab...
Thirty years ago, in Graham v. Connor, the Supreme Court determined that excessive-force claims agai...
The Florida v. Bostick decision raises important Fourth Amendment questions regarding police encount...
Loitering and disorderly conduct statutes have long been criticized as being catch-alls whereby the ...
The Administration\u27s recent policy of Say No to Drugs has sparked a veritable war on drugs with...
Section I of this Comment examines Terry v. Ohio, in which the Supreme Court decided that certain on...
The history of liberty, Justice Felix Frankfurter once noted, has largely been the history of obse...
While a large percentage of police-citizen encounters may be classified readily as falling within th...
This Article attempts to answer such questions by examining the evolution of search-and-seizure law ...
Can we live with the so-called exclusionary rule, which bars the use of illegally gained evidence in...
During the 1975 term the Supreme Court handed down nine opinions which involved the fourth amendment...
The most important step in the development of this constitutional provision came in 1886 in the famo...
Part I of this Article defines searches and seizures of property and person, discussing the Supreme ...
In Terry v. Ohio, the United States Supreme Court expanded the range of police conduct that falls wi...
This comment will begin by discussing how the Fourth Circuit\u27s rationale in United States v. Jenk...
The first section of this article considers whether the police officer\u27s intent is an indispensab...
Thirty years ago, in Graham v. Connor, the Supreme Court determined that excessive-force claims agai...
The Florida v. Bostick decision raises important Fourth Amendment questions regarding police encount...
Loitering and disorderly conduct statutes have long been criticized as being catch-alls whereby the ...
The Administration\u27s recent policy of Say No to Drugs has sparked a veritable war on drugs with...
Section I of this Comment examines Terry v. Ohio, in which the Supreme Court decided that certain on...
The history of liberty, Justice Felix Frankfurter once noted, has largely been the history of obse...
While a large percentage of police-citizen encounters may be classified readily as falling within th...
This Article attempts to answer such questions by examining the evolution of search-and-seizure law ...
Can we live with the so-called exclusionary rule, which bars the use of illegally gained evidence in...
During the 1975 term the Supreme Court handed down nine opinions which involved the fourth amendment...
The most important step in the development of this constitutional provision came in 1886 in the famo...
Part I of this Article defines searches and seizures of property and person, discussing the Supreme ...
In Terry v. Ohio, the United States Supreme Court expanded the range of police conduct that falls wi...
This comment will begin by discussing how the Fourth Circuit\u27s rationale in United States v. Jenk...
The first section of this article considers whether the police officer\u27s intent is an indispensab...
Thirty years ago, in Graham v. Connor, the Supreme Court determined that excessive-force claims agai...
The Florida v. Bostick decision raises important Fourth Amendment questions regarding police encount...