Tonight, I want to briefly discuss three aspects of the tribunal: structure, jurisdiction and U.S. participation in its creation. Many of you are probably aware that the tribunal consists of three chambers. The judicial chamber is comprised of five appellate judges and two trial panels of three judges each. The United States has a judge - Judge Gabrielle Kirk McDonald - who, before she went to the Hague was a federal district court judge and a professor at the Thurgood Marshall School of Law in Houston. I had an opportunity to meet her and brief her on some tribunal issues we in the U.S. government were working on
Brief summary by Julian Harris (editor of Amicus Curiae) of a debate on war crimes, humanitarian law...
Since the end the cold war new pattern of armed conflict is that of ferocious intrastate war. In the...
Generally, in post-conflict situations the domestic justice system is in a state of collapse. Doubts...
Years after the prosecution of Nazi and Japanese war criminals, the United Nations created an Intern...
My remarks will focus on three particular areas relating to war crimes and international criminal la...
I want to share my impressions of the way these newbreed international courts work, what problems be...
I want to present three potential problems of the Yugoslav War Crimes Tribunal which may limit the T...
Individual liability for war crimes is difficult to enforce and is unlikely to be accepted uniformly...
In creating the Yugoslav and Rwanda Tribunals, the UN Security Council used its power under Chapter ...
This presentation examines the history of the laws of war and the effort made through international ...
The International Criminal Tribunals for the former Yugoslavia and for Rwanda have come ...
This paper explores the relationship between international war crimes tribunals and reconciliation i...
This Article compares the protections and rights provided an accused before the Tribunal with those ...
The ICTY is not uncontroversial. Some commentators contend that unless it is able to try the big fi...
There are serious war crimes to investigate. Thus, it is not acceptable that several years must pass...
Brief summary by Julian Harris (editor of Amicus Curiae) of a debate on war crimes, humanitarian law...
Since the end the cold war new pattern of armed conflict is that of ferocious intrastate war. In the...
Generally, in post-conflict situations the domestic justice system is in a state of collapse. Doubts...
Years after the prosecution of Nazi and Japanese war criminals, the United Nations created an Intern...
My remarks will focus on three particular areas relating to war crimes and international criminal la...
I want to share my impressions of the way these newbreed international courts work, what problems be...
I want to present three potential problems of the Yugoslav War Crimes Tribunal which may limit the T...
Individual liability for war crimes is difficult to enforce and is unlikely to be accepted uniformly...
In creating the Yugoslav and Rwanda Tribunals, the UN Security Council used its power under Chapter ...
This presentation examines the history of the laws of war and the effort made through international ...
The International Criminal Tribunals for the former Yugoslavia and for Rwanda have come ...
This paper explores the relationship between international war crimes tribunals and reconciliation i...
This Article compares the protections and rights provided an accused before the Tribunal with those ...
The ICTY is not uncontroversial. Some commentators contend that unless it is able to try the big fi...
There are serious war crimes to investigate. Thus, it is not acceptable that several years must pass...
Brief summary by Julian Harris (editor of Amicus Curiae) of a debate on war crimes, humanitarian law...
Since the end the cold war new pattern of armed conflict is that of ferocious intrastate war. In the...
Generally, in post-conflict situations the domestic justice system is in a state of collapse. Doubts...