In any event, the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) has, during the last 35 years, made the ballot, with its implications of order and stability, available to over 25 million American workers. Some may suppose that the bulk of union organization has already taken place and that today the election function of the NLRB is relatively unimportant. This is not the case. The purpose of this paper is to examine, through the use of random sampling techniques, employee reactions to unions and employers, and to examine the effectiveness of NLRB policies followed in the regulation of representation elections
For over sixty years, the National Labor Relations Board has followed the “laboratory conditions” do...
This Article examines the performance of the NLRB in light of the fiftieth anniversary of the Nation...
This paper presents a literature review and critique of union decertification and deauthorization re...
The National Labor Relations Act created the National Labor Re- lations Board (NLRB) and vested the ...
In Union Representation Elections: Law and Reality [hereinafter cited as Law and Reality], we examin...
This Note evaluates these competing standards in light of the two major policy objectives of the NLR...
In Union Representation Elections. Law and Reality (hereinafterLaw and Reality without cross-referen...
A book review essay considering Union Representation Elections: Law and Reality, by Julius G. Getman...
The National Labor Relations Board¿s (NLRB) new election procedures represent a comprehensive reform...
[Excerpt] This study is a comprehensive analysis of employer behavior in representation elections su...
For years, scholars have criticized the National Labor Relations Board’s (NLRB’s or Board’s) relianc...
At the heart of every representation election campaign lie the communications made by either side to...
[Excerpt] Analyzing 1986-87 data from 261 NLRB certification election campaigns, the author finds th...
While previous studies by industrial relations and legal scholars have scrutinized NLRB decisions an...
Should the National Labor Relations Board\u27 set aside representation elections because one or more...
For over sixty years, the National Labor Relations Board has followed the “laboratory conditions” do...
This Article examines the performance of the NLRB in light of the fiftieth anniversary of the Nation...
This paper presents a literature review and critique of union decertification and deauthorization re...
The National Labor Relations Act created the National Labor Re- lations Board (NLRB) and vested the ...
In Union Representation Elections: Law and Reality [hereinafter cited as Law and Reality], we examin...
This Note evaluates these competing standards in light of the two major policy objectives of the NLR...
In Union Representation Elections. Law and Reality (hereinafterLaw and Reality without cross-referen...
A book review essay considering Union Representation Elections: Law and Reality, by Julius G. Getman...
The National Labor Relations Board¿s (NLRB) new election procedures represent a comprehensive reform...
[Excerpt] This study is a comprehensive analysis of employer behavior in representation elections su...
For years, scholars have criticized the National Labor Relations Board’s (NLRB’s or Board’s) relianc...
At the heart of every representation election campaign lie the communications made by either side to...
[Excerpt] Analyzing 1986-87 data from 261 NLRB certification election campaigns, the author finds th...
While previous studies by industrial relations and legal scholars have scrutinized NLRB decisions an...
Should the National Labor Relations Board\u27 set aside representation elections because one or more...
For over sixty years, the National Labor Relations Board has followed the “laboratory conditions” do...
This Article examines the performance of the NLRB in light of the fiftieth anniversary of the Nation...
This paper presents a literature review and critique of union decertification and deauthorization re...