With a simple one-page announcement on November 14, 1967, the Supreme Court of Ohio assumed not only the power of control, but, in a sense, responsibility for, the operations of one of the most variegated collections of minor courts in the country.\u27 The occasion was its adoption of uniform rules of practice in traffic matters for all courts inferior to the court of common pleas. In so doing it joined a limited group of some eight states, led by New Jersey, which dared to enter a potential quagmire dominated by local politicians, traffic safety zealots, civil libertarians and assorted publicity seekers
This comment outlines the law in Ohio concerning court-appointed representation of indigent defendan...
Tort reform emanates, for our purposes, from two primary bodies: state judicial and legislative bran...
In recent years, much public comment has centered on the issue of delay in civil and criminal litiga...
The Supreme Court of Ohio recently completed revision of its Rules of Practice. They became effectiv...
In the vast majority of cases, the Ohio Rules of Civil Procedure will be the primary source of autho...
During the 1981-1982 term the Ohio Supreme Court rendered 250 written opinions on a wide range of to...
The revolution is here! It has come quietly, almost without a murmur of opposition or civil discord....
While Ohio’s Rules of Criminal Procedure, effective July 1, 1973, are entirely new to the criminal l...
The Ohio Supreme Court has twice promulgated and the Ohio General Assembly has twice disapproved the...
While court created rules, in terms of their impact on society, are often as important as judicial d...
It is the writer\u27s intention to compare Ohio\u27s new juvenile code with that offered by the Crim...
This article will review, and comment upon, some of the techniques available to the Ohio appeals cou...
A 1968 amendment to the Ohio Constitution granted the Supreme Court of Ohio the authority to promulg...
The Course of Judicial Review in the State of Ohio. The first constitutionof Ohio was framed in 1802...
The Ohio Supreme Court continued in 1983 to expand and define its abrogation of the doctrine of sove...
This comment outlines the law in Ohio concerning court-appointed representation of indigent defendan...
Tort reform emanates, for our purposes, from two primary bodies: state judicial and legislative bran...
In recent years, much public comment has centered on the issue of delay in civil and criminal litiga...
The Supreme Court of Ohio recently completed revision of its Rules of Practice. They became effectiv...
In the vast majority of cases, the Ohio Rules of Civil Procedure will be the primary source of autho...
During the 1981-1982 term the Ohio Supreme Court rendered 250 written opinions on a wide range of to...
The revolution is here! It has come quietly, almost without a murmur of opposition or civil discord....
While Ohio’s Rules of Criminal Procedure, effective July 1, 1973, are entirely new to the criminal l...
The Ohio Supreme Court has twice promulgated and the Ohio General Assembly has twice disapproved the...
While court created rules, in terms of their impact on society, are often as important as judicial d...
It is the writer\u27s intention to compare Ohio\u27s new juvenile code with that offered by the Crim...
This article will review, and comment upon, some of the techniques available to the Ohio appeals cou...
A 1968 amendment to the Ohio Constitution granted the Supreme Court of Ohio the authority to promulg...
The Course of Judicial Review in the State of Ohio. The first constitutionof Ohio was framed in 1802...
The Ohio Supreme Court continued in 1983 to expand and define its abrogation of the doctrine of sove...
This comment outlines the law in Ohio concerning court-appointed representation of indigent defendan...
Tort reform emanates, for our purposes, from two primary bodies: state judicial and legislative bran...
In recent years, much public comment has centered on the issue of delay in civil and criminal litiga...