Add to ORKGThe frequency with which questions arise, and become the subject of legal controversy, concerning the liability of an employer to persons receiving injuries in his service, must be the excuse for the present paper. The legal questions have recently received the attention of many able jurists, and several of the difficulties which surrounded the general subject but a few years ago may now be considered permanently removed. The purpose here will be, to present the general rules which have been laid down by the authorities, with some of the reasons on which they are based
Although it has been held that, by virtue of the relation between them, the employer is bound to fur...
In the last century, there has been intermittent debate as to which of two theories, master's tort t...
The purpose of this Article is to consider the basis by which vicarious liability may extend to the ...
We hear it said frequently that the relations between master and servant have completely altered dur...
Returning now to the general question of the master\u27s liability for malicious acts in cases not a...
Speaking generally, one person can only be liable for the negligence of another when he stands towar...
It is quite clear today that the relation of master and servant, no longer represents the close bond...
The doctrine of respondeat superior has long been entrenched in Anglo-American jurisprudence. It is...
Injuries Arising Out of an Employment - An employee\u27s duties take him into the streets where he...
A master, riding as passenger in a vehicle operated by his servant within the scope of employment, s...
Master and Servant—Workmen\u27s Compensation—Right to Sue for Malpractice of Physician; Negligence o...
In the case of Kendall v. Gore Properties Inc. an employer was held liable for the willful and malic...
Plaintiff was employed as defendant\u27s bookkeeper. With the consent of the employer, she had done ...
At common law any person who wrongfully injures another, intentionally or negligently, is liable to ...
Should an employer be liable for the torts of his employee if he was compelled to employ him?The mas...
Although it has been held that, by virtue of the relation between them, the employer is bound to fur...
In the last century, there has been intermittent debate as to which of two theories, master's tort t...
The purpose of this Article is to consider the basis by which vicarious liability may extend to the ...
We hear it said frequently that the relations between master and servant have completely altered dur...
Returning now to the general question of the master\u27s liability for malicious acts in cases not a...
Speaking generally, one person can only be liable for the negligence of another when he stands towar...
It is quite clear today that the relation of master and servant, no longer represents the close bond...
The doctrine of respondeat superior has long been entrenched in Anglo-American jurisprudence. It is...
Injuries Arising Out of an Employment - An employee\u27s duties take him into the streets where he...
A master, riding as passenger in a vehicle operated by his servant within the scope of employment, s...
Master and Servant—Workmen\u27s Compensation—Right to Sue for Malpractice of Physician; Negligence o...
In the case of Kendall v. Gore Properties Inc. an employer was held liable for the willful and malic...
Plaintiff was employed as defendant\u27s bookkeeper. With the consent of the employer, she had done ...
At common law any person who wrongfully injures another, intentionally or negligently, is liable to ...
Should an employer be liable for the torts of his employee if he was compelled to employ him?The mas...
Although it has been held that, by virtue of the relation between them, the employer is bound to fur...
In the last century, there has been intermittent debate as to which of two theories, master's tort t...
The purpose of this Article is to consider the basis by which vicarious liability may extend to the ...