Soon after the United States Supreme Court’s decision in Obergefell v. Hodges, some elected officials and civil servants objected to the requirement that same-sex couples be offered marriage licenses. In particular, they argued that a government employee whose job duties include issuing marriage licenses cannot be forced to do so if it would violate his or her religion’s dictates. This piece argues that position is unavailing as it ignores the jurisprudence construing the free exercise clause of the First Amendment as well as the mandate created by the Court’s interpretation of the Fourteenth Amendment in Obergefell
The First Amendment of the United States Constitution, made applicable to the states through the Fou...
Two terms ago, in Hosanna-Tabor Evangelical Lutheran Church & School v. EEOC, the Supreme Court held...
Same-sex marriage is a controversial topic subject to great debate. The Supreme Court in 2015 federa...
The legitimacy of recent judgments in the Supreme Court, lower federal courts and State courts which...
In June, the Supreme Court held that state proscriptions on same-sex marriage violate the Fourteenth...
The Supreme Court’s landmark decision in Obergefell v. Hodges legalized same-sex marriage. The decis...
In June 2015, in Obergefell v. Hodges, the Supreme Court of the United States determined that there ...
The United States Supreme Court has struggled to find a fair and consistent approach to cases in whi...
Obergefell v. Hodges did not extend the rigor of the Equal Protection Clause to sexual orientation ...
The Supreme Court wrongly decided Employment Division v. Smith. Without briefing or argument over th...
On January 11, 2012 the United States Supreme Court ruled in Hosanna Tabor Evangelical Lutheran Scho...
State recognition of same-sex marriage has presented significant new challenges to the law of religi...
This article reports on the thick layers of law applicable to claims of religious exception to publi...
When, if ever, does the free exercise clause of the first amendment give an individual or organizati...
In Obergefell v. Hodges, the Supreme Court recognized the right of same-sex couples to be married.[1...
The First Amendment of the United States Constitution, made applicable to the states through the Fou...
Two terms ago, in Hosanna-Tabor Evangelical Lutheran Church & School v. EEOC, the Supreme Court held...
Same-sex marriage is a controversial topic subject to great debate. The Supreme Court in 2015 federa...
The legitimacy of recent judgments in the Supreme Court, lower federal courts and State courts which...
In June, the Supreme Court held that state proscriptions on same-sex marriage violate the Fourteenth...
The Supreme Court’s landmark decision in Obergefell v. Hodges legalized same-sex marriage. The decis...
In June 2015, in Obergefell v. Hodges, the Supreme Court of the United States determined that there ...
The United States Supreme Court has struggled to find a fair and consistent approach to cases in whi...
Obergefell v. Hodges did not extend the rigor of the Equal Protection Clause to sexual orientation ...
The Supreme Court wrongly decided Employment Division v. Smith. Without briefing or argument over th...
On January 11, 2012 the United States Supreme Court ruled in Hosanna Tabor Evangelical Lutheran Scho...
State recognition of same-sex marriage has presented significant new challenges to the law of religi...
This article reports on the thick layers of law applicable to claims of religious exception to publi...
When, if ever, does the free exercise clause of the first amendment give an individual or organizati...
In Obergefell v. Hodges, the Supreme Court recognized the right of same-sex couples to be married.[1...
The First Amendment of the United States Constitution, made applicable to the states through the Fou...
Two terms ago, in Hosanna-Tabor Evangelical Lutheran Church & School v. EEOC, the Supreme Court held...
Same-sex marriage is a controversial topic subject to great debate. The Supreme Court in 2015 federa...