Abstract Over the course of the twentieth century, judges came to accept trademark owners’ arguments that any kind of consumer confusion over their relationship to some other producer caused them actionable harm. Changes in the law of remedies, however, have recently led some courts to question these harm stories. This Article argues for even more attention to trademark’s theories of harm; a clear-eyed look at the marketing literature, as well as the facts of particular cases, indicates that confusion about non-competing products is often harmless
The primary objective of this Article is to illustrate the tendency of judges to inappropriately rel...
The debate over trademark use has become a hot-button issue in intellectual property (IP) law. In Co...
Trademark law is in the midst of an identity crisis. The prevailing economic account of the law has ...
For decades, the concept of actionable trademark infringement has been expanding. Source confusion, ...
Modern scholarship takes a decidedly negative view of trademark law. Commentators rail against doctr...
The typical shorthand justification for trademark rights centers on avoiding consumer confusion. But...
In recent decades, numerous scholars have challenged trademark law’s various conceptions of harm. Un...
This article argues that trademark infringement and dilution are best understood as commercial behav...
This Article argues that, while the Supreme Court\u27s holding in eBay v. MercExchange was a good—in...
A few months ago, my IP Issues entry demonstrated that the exclusive rights that trademark law provi...
At its core, trademark law exists as a tool for consumer protection. Thus, trademark owners use poli...
This article examines a case in which the defendants had made unauthorized use of the plaintiff’s tr...
The theory of reverse confusion has confounded courts because of the unique equities involved in thi...
This Article mediates a scholarly debate regarding the existence and desirability of a trademark us...
This article discusses Mark McKenna’s Testing Modern Trademark Law’s Theory of Harm as an important ...
The primary objective of this Article is to illustrate the tendency of judges to inappropriately rel...
The debate over trademark use has become a hot-button issue in intellectual property (IP) law. In Co...
Trademark law is in the midst of an identity crisis. The prevailing economic account of the law has ...
For decades, the concept of actionable trademark infringement has been expanding. Source confusion, ...
Modern scholarship takes a decidedly negative view of trademark law. Commentators rail against doctr...
The typical shorthand justification for trademark rights centers on avoiding consumer confusion. But...
In recent decades, numerous scholars have challenged trademark law’s various conceptions of harm. Un...
This article argues that trademark infringement and dilution are best understood as commercial behav...
This Article argues that, while the Supreme Court\u27s holding in eBay v. MercExchange was a good—in...
A few months ago, my IP Issues entry demonstrated that the exclusive rights that trademark law provi...
At its core, trademark law exists as a tool for consumer protection. Thus, trademark owners use poli...
This article examines a case in which the defendants had made unauthorized use of the plaintiff’s tr...
The theory of reverse confusion has confounded courts because of the unique equities involved in thi...
This Article mediates a scholarly debate regarding the existence and desirability of a trademark us...
This article discusses Mark McKenna’s Testing Modern Trademark Law’s Theory of Harm as an important ...
The primary objective of this Article is to illustrate the tendency of judges to inappropriately rel...
The debate over trademark use has become a hot-button issue in intellectual property (IP) law. In Co...
Trademark law is in the midst of an identity crisis. The prevailing economic account of the law has ...