In Hoopa Valley Tribe v. FERC, the Hoopa Valley Tribe challenged the intentional and continual delay of state water quality certification review of water discharged from a series of dams on the Klamath River in California and Oregon. The Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, the states of Oregon and California, and PacifiCorp, a hydroelectric operator, were implementing an administrative scheme designed to circumvent a one-year temporal requirement for review imposed on states by the Clean Water Act. This scheme allowed PacifiCorp to operate the series of dams for over a decade without proper state water quality certification. The United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit held in favor of the Hoopa Valley Tribe and...
Throughout 2011 and 2012, members of the Deschutes River community who fish in the Lower Deschutes R...
ABSTRACT On remand from the United States Supreme Court, this case addressed whether pollution excee...
The Sierra Club alleged Dominion violated the Clean Water Act by allowing arsenic to leak from coal ...
In Hoopa Valley Tribe v. FERC, the Hoopa Valley Tribe challenged the intentional and continual delay...
Attempts to alter water use agreements, especially those spanning back decades or even centuries, el...
The Court of Federal Claims ruled that the Klamath, Yurok and Hoopa (hereafter Tribes) reserved wate...
In Pyramid Lake Paiute Tribe of Indians v. Nevada, Dept. of Wildlife, the Court of Appeals for the N...
The Virginia State Water Control Board certified the issuance of permits for the construction of a n...
The U. S. Supreme Court held in California v. United States, 98 S. Ct. 2985 (1978), that under secti...
Trout Unlimited’s effort to overturn the EPA’s Water Transfers Rule was stifled by the Second Circui...
The struggle between California’s water plentiful north and the water deficient south has marked wat...
The Pit River Tribe of northern California sued the U.S. Forest service for not conducting a full en...
The Western Montana Water Users challenged the authority of the Flathead Joint Control Board to ente...
This case presents the following issues: 1) whether the Montana Department of Environmental Quality ...
In Agua Caliente Band of Cahuilla Indians v. Coachella Valley Water Dist., the Ninth Circuit upheld ...
Throughout 2011 and 2012, members of the Deschutes River community who fish in the Lower Deschutes R...
ABSTRACT On remand from the United States Supreme Court, this case addressed whether pollution excee...
The Sierra Club alleged Dominion violated the Clean Water Act by allowing arsenic to leak from coal ...
In Hoopa Valley Tribe v. FERC, the Hoopa Valley Tribe challenged the intentional and continual delay...
Attempts to alter water use agreements, especially those spanning back decades or even centuries, el...
The Court of Federal Claims ruled that the Klamath, Yurok and Hoopa (hereafter Tribes) reserved wate...
In Pyramid Lake Paiute Tribe of Indians v. Nevada, Dept. of Wildlife, the Court of Appeals for the N...
The Virginia State Water Control Board certified the issuance of permits for the construction of a n...
The U. S. Supreme Court held in California v. United States, 98 S. Ct. 2985 (1978), that under secti...
Trout Unlimited’s effort to overturn the EPA’s Water Transfers Rule was stifled by the Second Circui...
The struggle between California’s water plentiful north and the water deficient south has marked wat...
The Pit River Tribe of northern California sued the U.S. Forest service for not conducting a full en...
The Western Montana Water Users challenged the authority of the Flathead Joint Control Board to ente...
This case presents the following issues: 1) whether the Montana Department of Environmental Quality ...
In Agua Caliente Band of Cahuilla Indians v. Coachella Valley Water Dist., the Ninth Circuit upheld ...
Throughout 2011 and 2012, members of the Deschutes River community who fish in the Lower Deschutes R...
ABSTRACT On remand from the United States Supreme Court, this case addressed whether pollution excee...
The Sierra Club alleged Dominion violated the Clean Water Act by allowing arsenic to leak from coal ...