This case presents the issue of whether a tax credit program can reimburse scholarship donors when the resulting scholarships can be used for religious schools under 1) Article X, section 6 of the Montana Constitution and 2) the First Amendment of the United States Constitution
The Supreme Court’s latest church-state decision opens the door to direct funding of religious insti...
The Establishment Clause of the First Amendment protects against government-established religion. Th...
On June 27, 2002, in Zelman v. Simmons-Harris, the United States Supreme Court upheld Ohio\u27s scho...
This case presents the issue of whether a tax credit program can reimburse scholarship donors when t...
Does excluding religious schools from a state-sponsored scholarship program amount to unconstitution...
Does excluding religious schools from a state-sponsored scholarship program amount to unconstitution...
For many school-choice advocates, Espinoza v. Montana Department of Revenue is the chance to extend...
The relationship between the government and the church is frequently debated in the United States. O...
In a 5-4 decision in Arizona Christian School Tuition Organization v. Winn, the U.S. Supreme Court d...
The issue of public funding of religious institutions in education is bound up with the establishmen...
This note considers the Court\u27s treatment of New York\u27s tuition reimbursement (Section 2) and ...
This short essay takes as its starting point on the Supreme Court’s recent decision in Winn v. Arizo...
For many school-choice advocates, Espinoza v. Montana Department of Revenue is the chance to extend...
This report details the constitutional standards that currently apply to indirect aid programs and s...
Based on current conditions, and for a variety of reasons, the best guess—and it is only a guess—is ...
The Supreme Court’s latest church-state decision opens the door to direct funding of religious insti...
The Establishment Clause of the First Amendment protects against government-established religion. Th...
On June 27, 2002, in Zelman v. Simmons-Harris, the United States Supreme Court upheld Ohio\u27s scho...
This case presents the issue of whether a tax credit program can reimburse scholarship donors when t...
Does excluding religious schools from a state-sponsored scholarship program amount to unconstitution...
Does excluding religious schools from a state-sponsored scholarship program amount to unconstitution...
For many school-choice advocates, Espinoza v. Montana Department of Revenue is the chance to extend...
The relationship between the government and the church is frequently debated in the United States. O...
In a 5-4 decision in Arizona Christian School Tuition Organization v. Winn, the U.S. Supreme Court d...
The issue of public funding of religious institutions in education is bound up with the establishmen...
This note considers the Court\u27s treatment of New York\u27s tuition reimbursement (Section 2) and ...
This short essay takes as its starting point on the Supreme Court’s recent decision in Winn v. Arizo...
For many school-choice advocates, Espinoza v. Montana Department of Revenue is the chance to extend...
This report details the constitutional standards that currently apply to indirect aid programs and s...
Based on current conditions, and for a variety of reasons, the best guess—and it is only a guess—is ...
The Supreme Court’s latest church-state decision opens the door to direct funding of religious insti...
The Establishment Clause of the First Amendment protects against government-established religion. Th...
On June 27, 2002, in Zelman v. Simmons-Harris, the United States Supreme Court upheld Ohio\u27s scho...