Add to ORKGThe United States District Court for the District of Columbia found that the BLM and Forest Service did not act arbitrarily and capriciously when they maintained and extended a boundary fence and decided not to expand a wild horse and burro range. The court also held the BLM used reasoned decision making when it determined a target horse and burro population in a herd management plan. Additionally, a National Environmental Policy Act claim was defeated under the “capable of repetition yet evading review” exception to the mootness doctrine
The Idaho District Court granted WWP’s motion for summary judgment and denied those of the BLM and i...
In Great Basin Resource Watch v. Bureau of Land Management, the Ninth Circuit invalidated the BLM’s ...
The United States District Court for the District of Montana granted Plaintiffs summary judgment aga...
In Theodore Roosevelt Conservation Partnership v. Salazar, the United States District Court of Appea...
Two environmental advocacy groups challenged the decision of the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (FWS...
In Alliance for the Wild Rockies v. Salazar, the United States District Court for the District of Mo...
Responding to an overpopulation of wild horses on the BLM lands in the state, Wyoming sued the Secre...
Since the gray wolf‟s reintroduction to the northern Rocky Mountains, competing interests have debat...
A federal court in Montana vacated the lease sale of several large oil and gas developments in Monta...
The Montana Supreme Court held that the district court erred as a matter of law and abused its discr...
The United States Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals held that the U.S. Forest Service‟s proxy-on-proxy ...
In 2007, the Bureau of Land Management adopted a resource management plan that essentially made all ...
In Russell Country Sportsmen v. U.S. Forest Service, the District Court for the District of Montana ...
In Native Ecosystems Council v. Marten, the Ninth Circuit found that the United States Forest Servic...
The United States District Court for the Northern District of California granted a preliminary injun...
The Idaho District Court granted WWP’s motion for summary judgment and denied those of the BLM and i...
In Great Basin Resource Watch v. Bureau of Land Management, the Ninth Circuit invalidated the BLM’s ...
The United States District Court for the District of Montana granted Plaintiffs summary judgment aga...
In Theodore Roosevelt Conservation Partnership v. Salazar, the United States District Court of Appea...
Two environmental advocacy groups challenged the decision of the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (FWS...
In Alliance for the Wild Rockies v. Salazar, the United States District Court for the District of Mo...
Responding to an overpopulation of wild horses on the BLM lands in the state, Wyoming sued the Secre...
Since the gray wolf‟s reintroduction to the northern Rocky Mountains, competing interests have debat...
A federal court in Montana vacated the lease sale of several large oil and gas developments in Monta...
The Montana Supreme Court held that the district court erred as a matter of law and abused its discr...
The United States Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals held that the U.S. Forest Service‟s proxy-on-proxy ...
In 2007, the Bureau of Land Management adopted a resource management plan that essentially made all ...
In Russell Country Sportsmen v. U.S. Forest Service, the District Court for the District of Montana ...
In Native Ecosystems Council v. Marten, the Ninth Circuit found that the United States Forest Servic...
The United States District Court for the Northern District of California granted a preliminary injun...
The Idaho District Court granted WWP’s motion for summary judgment and denied those of the BLM and i...
In Great Basin Resource Watch v. Bureau of Land Management, the Ninth Circuit invalidated the BLM’s ...
The United States District Court for the District of Montana granted Plaintiffs summary judgment aga...