In What\u27s Law Got to Do With It?, the nation\u27s top legal scholars and political scientists examine to what extent the law actually shapes how judges behave and make decisions, and what it means for society at large. Although there is a growing consensus among legal scholars and political scientists, significant points of divergence remain. Contributors to this book explore ways to reach greater accord on the complexity and nuance of judicial decisionmaking and judicial elections, while acknowledging that agreement on what judges do is not likely to occur any time soon. As the first forum in which political scientists and legal scholars engage with one another on these hot button issues, this volume strives to establish a true interdis...
The judicialization of politics signifies the reliance on courts and judicial means to address core ...
The purpose of this conference is a dialogue between scholars and judges about judging. Because judg...
In the realm of American jurisprudence, little draws more excitement or controversy than investigati...
In What\u27s Law Got to Do With It?, the nation\u27s top legal scholars and political scientists exa...
An elected judiciary is virtually unique to the American experience and creates a paradox in a repre...
In this paper, which was prepared to help set the stage at an interdisciplinary conference held at t...
Throughout American history, judges and legal scholars have articulated and maintained a sharp separ...
The rule of law paradigm has long operated on the premise that independent judges disregard extraleg...
This essay seeks to untangle the many possible meanings of politics in descriptions of judicial be...
The study of judicial politics using empirical methods to gain insight into the process of judicial ...
Scholars who use empirical methods to study the behavior of judges long have labored in relative obs...
Over the past two decades, the United States has seen an intense debate about the composition of the...
A core insight of the legal realists was that many disputes are indeterminate. For example, in many ...
The object of study of this thesis is provided insight into the legal interdimensionality of the con...
Work of judges is dependent on generally accepted statements about the nature of their activity. The...
The judicialization of politics signifies the reliance on courts and judicial means to address core ...
The purpose of this conference is a dialogue between scholars and judges about judging. Because judg...
In the realm of American jurisprudence, little draws more excitement or controversy than investigati...
In What\u27s Law Got to Do With It?, the nation\u27s top legal scholars and political scientists exa...
An elected judiciary is virtually unique to the American experience and creates a paradox in a repre...
In this paper, which was prepared to help set the stage at an interdisciplinary conference held at t...
Throughout American history, judges and legal scholars have articulated and maintained a sharp separ...
The rule of law paradigm has long operated on the premise that independent judges disregard extraleg...
This essay seeks to untangle the many possible meanings of politics in descriptions of judicial be...
The study of judicial politics using empirical methods to gain insight into the process of judicial ...
Scholars who use empirical methods to study the behavior of judges long have labored in relative obs...
Over the past two decades, the United States has seen an intense debate about the composition of the...
A core insight of the legal realists was that many disputes are indeterminate. For example, in many ...
The object of study of this thesis is provided insight into the legal interdimensionality of the con...
Work of judges is dependent on generally accepted statements about the nature of their activity. The...
The judicialization of politics signifies the reliance on courts and judicial means to address core ...
The purpose of this conference is a dialogue between scholars and judges about judging. Because judg...
In the realm of American jurisprudence, little draws more excitement or controversy than investigati...