Add to ORKGThis article examines United States v. Rangel-Guzman, 752 F.3d 1222 (9th Circ. 2014) to illustrate the possibility of a lawyer violating Model Rule of Professional Conduct 3.7 without ever becoming an official witness
The author enumerates the three most common situations in which the courts have required the prosecu...
Expert testimony is indispensable to the uniquely American system of adversary justice. Without the ...
Attorneys have special social privileges; they can file complaints on behalf of clients, and compel ...
This article examines United States v. Rangel-Guzman, 752 F.3d 1222 (9th Circ. 2014) to illustrate t...
In every state, the professional rules of conduct contain a prohibition on an attorney acting as bot...
A lawyer charged with a disciplinary violation is in a precarious position. Not only has the lawyer ...
Prompted by the increasing recognition that certain economic and political conduct (such as consumer...
Lawyers frequently draft settlements that impede other parties\u27 access to relevant evidence throu...
This article discusses the practice of tendering an expert for acceptance or certification by the co...
At least three federal circuits have approved a trial judge\u27s decision to give a cautionary accom...
Attorney-experts in legal malpractice litigation are like many other experts. Although easily dist...
Although all attorneys understand that coaching a witness to testify falsely is unethical, additiona...
Three recent legislative and regulatory initiatives -- the Sarbanes-Oxley Act, the 2003 amendments t...
Attorney-experts in legal malpractice litigation are like many other experts. Although easily distin...
The practice of subpoenaing an attorney to appear before a federal grand jury investigating his clie...
The author enumerates the three most common situations in which the courts have required the prosecu...
Expert testimony is indispensable to the uniquely American system of adversary justice. Without the ...
Attorneys have special social privileges; they can file complaints on behalf of clients, and compel ...
This article examines United States v. Rangel-Guzman, 752 F.3d 1222 (9th Circ. 2014) to illustrate t...
In every state, the professional rules of conduct contain a prohibition on an attorney acting as bot...
A lawyer charged with a disciplinary violation is in a precarious position. Not only has the lawyer ...
Prompted by the increasing recognition that certain economic and political conduct (such as consumer...
Lawyers frequently draft settlements that impede other parties\u27 access to relevant evidence throu...
This article discusses the practice of tendering an expert for acceptance or certification by the co...
At least three federal circuits have approved a trial judge\u27s decision to give a cautionary accom...
Attorney-experts in legal malpractice litigation are like many other experts. Although easily dist...
Although all attorneys understand that coaching a witness to testify falsely is unethical, additiona...
Three recent legislative and regulatory initiatives -- the Sarbanes-Oxley Act, the 2003 amendments t...
Attorney-experts in legal malpractice litigation are like many other experts. Although easily distin...
The practice of subpoenaing an attorney to appear before a federal grand jury investigating his clie...
The author enumerates the three most common situations in which the courts have required the prosecu...
Expert testimony is indispensable to the uniquely American system of adversary justice. Without the ...
Attorneys have special social privileges; they can file complaints on behalf of clients, and compel ...