The four courts and 14 judges who heard the Powley case all recommended that the Crown enter into negotiations with the Métis. This paper draws on dispute resolution design principles to outline a role for courts that will ensure that negotiations take place. These negotiations should address three important issues: The identification of a Métis community, characteristics of membership and criteria for representation. The author argues that proper prior negotiations, even if they do not result in agreement, can help courts make better decisions on the three issues outlined above
The issue of the appointment of judicial mediators has once again been raised – this time by the Vic...
While arbitration was robust in colonial and early America, dispute resolution lost its footing to t...
This paper critically considers judicial approaches to and promotion of mediation within the English...
The four courts and 14 judges who heard the Powley case all recommended that the Crown enter into ne...
The four courts and 14 judges who heard the Powley case all recommended that the Crown enter into ne...
The Supreme Court of Canada has often encouraged the Crown and Aboriginal parties to find negotiated...
The National Institute for Dispute Resolution, in conjunction with the Harvard Program on Negotiatio...
In this article, we address the issue of how to integrate notions of fairness and justice into an in...
In 1992, the Queensland Building Tribunal was established with the specific goal of obtaining quick,...
The paper is deemed to present the advantages of resolving a dispute or a potential dispute througho...
In the past few decades, the role of judges has changed dramatically, yet its nature has remained la...
The objective of this portion of our conference on judicial reform is to discuss means to promote sw...
The number of public policy conflicts has increased sharply in most western democracies, especially ...
It is an indubitable fact that the use of mediation as a form of dispute resolution process has gain...
Having a few definitions in place helps us understand why there has been a shift in emphasis from re...
The issue of the appointment of judicial mediators has once again been raised – this time by the Vic...
While arbitration was robust in colonial and early America, dispute resolution lost its footing to t...
This paper critically considers judicial approaches to and promotion of mediation within the English...
The four courts and 14 judges who heard the Powley case all recommended that the Crown enter into ne...
The four courts and 14 judges who heard the Powley case all recommended that the Crown enter into ne...
The Supreme Court of Canada has often encouraged the Crown and Aboriginal parties to find negotiated...
The National Institute for Dispute Resolution, in conjunction with the Harvard Program on Negotiatio...
In this article, we address the issue of how to integrate notions of fairness and justice into an in...
In 1992, the Queensland Building Tribunal was established with the specific goal of obtaining quick,...
The paper is deemed to present the advantages of resolving a dispute or a potential dispute througho...
In the past few decades, the role of judges has changed dramatically, yet its nature has remained la...
The objective of this portion of our conference on judicial reform is to discuss means to promote sw...
The number of public policy conflicts has increased sharply in most western democracies, especially ...
It is an indubitable fact that the use of mediation as a form of dispute resolution process has gain...
Having a few definitions in place helps us understand why there has been a shift in emphasis from re...
The issue of the appointment of judicial mediators has once again been raised – this time by the Vic...
While arbitration was robust in colonial and early America, dispute resolution lost its footing to t...
This paper critically considers judicial approaches to and promotion of mediation within the English...