The Supreme Court of Canada\u27s initial interpretations of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms were as broad and liberal as could possibly have been expected. Invoking the metaphor of the constitution as a living tree and dismissing concerns about the legitimacy of its expanded role, the Court upheld the Charter arguments in the majority of the cases it decided during this first period. Even in those cases where the claim was denied, the Court made it clear that the Charter was to be taken very seriously. No one could mistake the Court\u27s message: the Charter was to be liberally interpreted and enthusiastically applied
Competing theories regarding the development of a rights revolution in Canada have appeared in the...
Since the early days of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms, the Supreme Court of Canada ha...
This article responds to the argument that judicial review of legislation under the Canadian Charter...
“Charter values” is a term used with increasing frequency in the decisions of the Supreme Court of C...
The text of the Charter separates the rights conferred from reasonable limits which may justifiably ...
For those concerned about the democratic legitimacy of Charter review by Canadian courts, the idea o...
This study presents a descriptive statistical analysis of the Supreme Court of Canada\u27s first one...
The Court has claimed the role of “guardian of the constitution”, and neither Parliament nor the pro...
The adoption of the Charter of Rights in 1982 thrust a new role on the Supreme Court of Canada. The ...
The proponents of the Charter of Rights and Freedoms are fighting a mighty battle to show that, desp...
he Supreme Court of Canada has explained Canada\u27s commitment to freedom of expression in section ...
What would the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms have looked like if it had been designed for ...
This paper presents the annual review of the Supreme Court’s jurispru-dence for Osgoode Hall’s Annua...
Competing theories regarding the development of a “rights revolution” in Canada have appeared in the...
This article presents a statistical analysis of the first 352 Charter of Rights and Freedoms decisio...
Competing theories regarding the development of a rights revolution in Canada have appeared in the...
Since the early days of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms, the Supreme Court of Canada ha...
This article responds to the argument that judicial review of legislation under the Canadian Charter...
“Charter values” is a term used with increasing frequency in the decisions of the Supreme Court of C...
The text of the Charter separates the rights conferred from reasonable limits which may justifiably ...
For those concerned about the democratic legitimacy of Charter review by Canadian courts, the idea o...
This study presents a descriptive statistical analysis of the Supreme Court of Canada\u27s first one...
The Court has claimed the role of “guardian of the constitution”, and neither Parliament nor the pro...
The adoption of the Charter of Rights in 1982 thrust a new role on the Supreme Court of Canada. The ...
The proponents of the Charter of Rights and Freedoms are fighting a mighty battle to show that, desp...
he Supreme Court of Canada has explained Canada\u27s commitment to freedom of expression in section ...
What would the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms have looked like if it had been designed for ...
This paper presents the annual review of the Supreme Court’s jurispru-dence for Osgoode Hall’s Annua...
Competing theories regarding the development of a “rights revolution” in Canada have appeared in the...
This article presents a statistical analysis of the first 352 Charter of Rights and Freedoms decisio...
Competing theories regarding the development of a rights revolution in Canada have appeared in the...
Since the early days of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms, the Supreme Court of Canada ha...
This article responds to the argument that judicial review of legislation under the Canadian Charter...