This chapter questions the interpretation of religious signs and symbols— and the interpretive possibilities that emerge when we demand more from one another in thinking about such symbols— by examining the question of judges and religious dress in the particular context of the judge’s role as wielding the coercive force of the state through the exercise of criminal punishment. I advance the argument that recent debates have proceeded on a misleadingly simplistic approach to understanding the meaning of signs of religious belonging and identity in this setting and that, with this, we miss an opportunity for a deeper understanding of the virtues that we hope to find in our public officials
This Comment advocates for the acknowledgment of religious values in judicial decision-making in thr...
At the dawn of the twenty-first century, something rather unexpected happened: religion became signi...
The recent years have seen, in the West, an increasing debate on the presence of religious symbols i...
This chapter questions the interpretation of religious signs and symbols— and the interpretive pos...
As a nation that values and guarantees religious freedom, the United States is often faced with ques...
In contemporary pluralist states, where faith communities live together, different religious symbols...
The Supreme Court\u27s jurisprudence concerning public displays of religious symbols is notoriously ...
Visual representations of religious symbols continue to puzzle judges. Lacking empirical data on how...
none1noThis paper focuses on the conflicts that arise in relation to the “the place” of religious sy...
Judicial denial of obvious confessional meaning and invention of substitute secular meanings for con...
In the United States and Europe the constitutionality of government displays of confessional symbols...
Daniel Whistler and Daniel Hill ask what kind of harm religious symbols might cause
From a historical and anthropological point of view, there is a close link between religion and the ...
This report is the product of the Arts-and-Humanities Research Council’s Connected Communities progr...
In the Supreme Court’s most recent freedom of religion case, Justice Alito and Justice Ginsburg disa...
This Comment advocates for the acknowledgment of religious values in judicial decision-making in thr...
At the dawn of the twenty-first century, something rather unexpected happened: religion became signi...
The recent years have seen, in the West, an increasing debate on the presence of religious symbols i...
This chapter questions the interpretation of religious signs and symbols— and the interpretive pos...
As a nation that values and guarantees religious freedom, the United States is often faced with ques...
In contemporary pluralist states, where faith communities live together, different religious symbols...
The Supreme Court\u27s jurisprudence concerning public displays of religious symbols is notoriously ...
Visual representations of religious symbols continue to puzzle judges. Lacking empirical data on how...
none1noThis paper focuses on the conflicts that arise in relation to the “the place” of religious sy...
Judicial denial of obvious confessional meaning and invention of substitute secular meanings for con...
In the United States and Europe the constitutionality of government displays of confessional symbols...
Daniel Whistler and Daniel Hill ask what kind of harm religious symbols might cause
From a historical and anthropological point of view, there is a close link between religion and the ...
This report is the product of the Arts-and-Humanities Research Council’s Connected Communities progr...
In the Supreme Court’s most recent freedom of religion case, Justice Alito and Justice Ginsburg disa...
This Comment advocates for the acknowledgment of religious values in judicial decision-making in thr...
At the dawn of the twenty-first century, something rather unexpected happened: religion became signi...
The recent years have seen, in the West, an increasing debate on the presence of religious symbols i...