Add to ORKG.png%3Fwidth%3D300&w=3840&q=75)
Recent international developments have introduced the possibility of war waged on behalf of people u...
This article explores the restraints international human rights law and international humanitarian l...
Literature reviewed so far shows that several scholars dismiss targeted killings as clear violation ...
time: 2.30-4.30pmroom: Osgoode Hall – IKB 4034speaker: Adil Haque (Rutgers-Newark)respondent: Mohama...
Why do belligerents intentionally kill legally protected civilians during armed conflict? Such acts ...
This paper addresses two questions about the morality of warfare: (1) how much risk must soldiers ...
The paper builds on a current debate in the philosophy of war, which are rules that contribute to th...
This Article confronts one of the most difficult and contested questions in the debate about targete...
This dissertation examines the problem of the mistaken killing of civilians in armed conflict. This ...
The targeting of persons engages the most fundamental of all the norms in the law of war: the princi...
Targeted killing is a lethal and irreversible counterterrorism measure. Its use is governed by ambig...
Protocol I to the Geneva Conventions of 1949 and the interpretation given to it by many in the inter...
This article suggests that the best available normative framework for guiding conduct in war rests o...
The duty to capture stands at the fault line between competing legal regimes that might govern targe...
The law of armed conflict provides the authority to use lethal force as a first resort against ident...
Recent international developments have introduced the possibility of war waged on behalf of people u...
This article explores the restraints international human rights law and international humanitarian l...
Literature reviewed so far shows that several scholars dismiss targeted killings as clear violation ...
time: 2.30-4.30pmroom: Osgoode Hall – IKB 4034speaker: Adil Haque (Rutgers-Newark)respondent: Mohama...
Why do belligerents intentionally kill legally protected civilians during armed conflict? Such acts ...
This paper addresses two questions about the morality of warfare: (1) how much risk must soldiers ...
The paper builds on a current debate in the philosophy of war, which are rules that contribute to th...
This Article confronts one of the most difficult and contested questions in the debate about targete...
This dissertation examines the problem of the mistaken killing of civilians in armed conflict. This ...
The targeting of persons engages the most fundamental of all the norms in the law of war: the princi...
Targeted killing is a lethal and irreversible counterterrorism measure. Its use is governed by ambig...
Protocol I to the Geneva Conventions of 1949 and the interpretation given to it by many in the inter...
This article suggests that the best available normative framework for guiding conduct in war rests o...
The duty to capture stands at the fault line between competing legal regimes that might govern targe...
The law of armed conflict provides the authority to use lethal force as a first resort against ident...
Recent international developments have introduced the possibility of war waged on behalf of people u...
This article explores the restraints international human rights law and international humanitarian l...
Literature reviewed so far shows that several scholars dismiss targeted killings as clear violation ...