This panel explores what makes an effective and efficient no-contest settlement and to what extent they further the public interest and/or aid in investor recovery and whether investor recovery is a goal of enforcement settlements. This panel discusses what Canada can learn from the American experience with no-contest settlements in practice. This panel also explores the nascent Ontario experience with no-contest settlements and speak to whether they should be adopted elsewhere in Canada
This article situates the action in ADR theory by viewing it as a hybrid process that draws on both ...
Among the ways in which multinational enterprises (MNEs) can shift profits from one jurisdiction to ...
Résumé: Le présent fascicule expose le contexte général dans lequel s'inscrivent les outils antiévit...
This panel explores what makes an effective and efficient no-contest settlement and to what extent t...
This panel explores the Canadian versus US experience with investor recovery facilitated (by the Sec...
This panel discusses the role of industry funded compensation funds for wronged investors, and consi...
This presentation will argue that, contrary to the claims of those opposed to investor state dispute...
WHAT: A one-day conference, entitled Public & Private Securities Enforcement: Improving Recovery for...
In light of AIC Limited v Fischer, 2013 SCC 69, [2013] 3 SCR 949, this panel critically examines the...
Deferred prosecution agreements (DPAs) and non-prosecution agreements (NPAs) have become increasingl...
During the past decade, Canada has seen a dramatic rise in securities class action lawsuits. The vas...
In light of Kaynes v BP, PLC, 2014 ONCA 580, this panel critically analyzes the circumstances under ...
The article presents a model for reform of investor-state arbitration aimed at enhancing institution...
This paper explores NAFTA Chapter 11 claims filed against Canada through a closer examination of cla...
This panel discusses OBSI’s role in facilitating investor recovery. The panel compares OBSI’s mandat...
This article situates the action in ADR theory by viewing it as a hybrid process that draws on both ...
Among the ways in which multinational enterprises (MNEs) can shift profits from one jurisdiction to ...
Résumé: Le présent fascicule expose le contexte général dans lequel s'inscrivent les outils antiévit...
This panel explores what makes an effective and efficient no-contest settlement and to what extent t...
This panel explores the Canadian versus US experience with investor recovery facilitated (by the Sec...
This panel discusses the role of industry funded compensation funds for wronged investors, and consi...
This presentation will argue that, contrary to the claims of those opposed to investor state dispute...
WHAT: A one-day conference, entitled Public & Private Securities Enforcement: Improving Recovery for...
In light of AIC Limited v Fischer, 2013 SCC 69, [2013] 3 SCR 949, this panel critically examines the...
Deferred prosecution agreements (DPAs) and non-prosecution agreements (NPAs) have become increasingl...
During the past decade, Canada has seen a dramatic rise in securities class action lawsuits. The vas...
In light of Kaynes v BP, PLC, 2014 ONCA 580, this panel critically analyzes the circumstances under ...
The article presents a model for reform of investor-state arbitration aimed at enhancing institution...
This paper explores NAFTA Chapter 11 claims filed against Canada through a closer examination of cla...
This panel discusses OBSI’s role in facilitating investor recovery. The panel compares OBSI’s mandat...
This article situates the action in ADR theory by viewing it as a hybrid process that draws on both ...
Among the ways in which multinational enterprises (MNEs) can shift profits from one jurisdiction to ...
Résumé: Le présent fascicule expose le contexte général dans lequel s'inscrivent les outils antiévit...
.svg%3Fwidth%3D300&w=3840&q=75)
Add to ORKG