The Honourable Mr. Justice Marshall Rothstein of the Supreme Court of Canada discusses the nexus between specialist technical expertise and the generalism of judges of courts of appeal, as well as commenting on the peculiar direction for the standard of review of the various administrative bodies that govern most IP matters
The Supreme Court of Canada has periodically altered its approach to judicial review in order to mak...
Though we live in an era of hyper-specialization, the judiciary has for the most part remained the d...
Conventional judicial wisdom assumes and indeed celebrates the ideal of the generalist judge, but do...
The Honourable Mr. Justice Marshall Rothstein of the Supreme Court of Canada discusses the nexus bet...
The Honourable Mr. Justice Marshall Rothstein of the Supreme Court of Canada shares his thoughts reg...
So, today, I am going to speak to you about justiciability—what government decisions can be subject ...
In the last fifteen years, the Supreme Court of Canada operated a substantial move regarding judicia...
Peter Hogg, a constitutional law scholar, was retained by the Commissioner for Federal Judicial Affa...
In Dunsmuir v. New Brunswick, the Supreme Court re-examined its approach to judicial review of admin...
In this article, we review a selection of Justice Rothstein’s tax judgments with the object of makin...
Expertise, bias and delay arguments are shifting the focus of judicial review from the legality of a...
Specialization is common in medicine. Doctors become oncologists, radiologists, urologists, or even ...
This award-winning publication is an in-depth presentation of the law of judicial review of administ...
This article investigates how civil court judges practice meta-expertise in cases that feature contr...
This paper examines the development of judicial review. In doing so, it concentrates on the changes ...
The Supreme Court of Canada has periodically altered its approach to judicial review in order to mak...
Though we live in an era of hyper-specialization, the judiciary has for the most part remained the d...
Conventional judicial wisdom assumes and indeed celebrates the ideal of the generalist judge, but do...
The Honourable Mr. Justice Marshall Rothstein of the Supreme Court of Canada discusses the nexus bet...
The Honourable Mr. Justice Marshall Rothstein of the Supreme Court of Canada shares his thoughts reg...
So, today, I am going to speak to you about justiciability—what government decisions can be subject ...
In the last fifteen years, the Supreme Court of Canada operated a substantial move regarding judicia...
Peter Hogg, a constitutional law scholar, was retained by the Commissioner for Federal Judicial Affa...
In Dunsmuir v. New Brunswick, the Supreme Court re-examined its approach to judicial review of admin...
In this article, we review a selection of Justice Rothstein’s tax judgments with the object of makin...
Expertise, bias and delay arguments are shifting the focus of judicial review from the legality of a...
Specialization is common in medicine. Doctors become oncologists, radiologists, urologists, or even ...
This award-winning publication is an in-depth presentation of the law of judicial review of administ...
This article investigates how civil court judges practice meta-expertise in cases that feature contr...
This paper examines the development of judicial review. In doing so, it concentrates on the changes ...
The Supreme Court of Canada has periodically altered its approach to judicial review in order to mak...
Though we live in an era of hyper-specialization, the judiciary has for the most part remained the d...
Conventional judicial wisdom assumes and indeed celebrates the ideal of the generalist judge, but do...
.svg%3Fwidth%3D300&w=3840&q=75)
Add to ORKG