In this essay, it is contended that by welcoming a cosmopolitan discipline of law that encompasses \u27all levels of social relations and legal orderings\u27 (both dominant and peripheral) as well as by suggesting that the intellectual heritage of Western jurisprudence be adapted \u27to the new predicament of global law\u27, William Twining offers a platform to the world’s marginalized legal systems and formations to assert their relevance in the advancement of legal theory. In developing this argument, I will first examine what opportunities exist within Twining’s theorizing to reclaim and de-marginalize non-Western understandings of the law and its social value within the context of pluralism and globalisation. Secondly, I discuss what co...