The 30th anniversary of the Reference re Resolution to Amend the Constitution is an opportunity to reflect on Canada’s constitutional tradition. While the Reference is most famous for articulating a constitutional convention requiring “substantial provincial consent”, I interrogate the Reference for its broader impact on constitutional law. Situating the Reference in its historical context, I argue that it was both a product of a peculiarly Canadian legal tradition, and a harbinger of important new directions in Canadian constitutional litigation and jurisprudence
Canada in Question is an apt title for D. V. Smiley\u27s book discussing federalism in the seventies...
Recent American debates about the relationship between the historic political compromises underlying...
L'auteur évalue l'opération de rapatriement de la Constitution du Canada entreprise de 1980 à 1982. ...
The 30th anniversary of the Reference re Resolution to Amend the Constitution is an opportunity to r...
The Supreme Court’s decision in the Patriation Reference was a landmark in the jurisprudential analy...
The legacy of the Supreme Court’s decisions in the Patriation Reference and the Quebec Veto Referenc...
The Canadian constitution, also known as the British North America Act, 1867, has been patriated. ...
Commentators have suggested that the unsuccessful national referendum to ratify the 1992 Charlotteto...
Conventions are among the most important rules of the Canadian constitution. Yet orthodox legal theo...
This thesis seeks to identify the conceptual resources available to Canadian courts in the adjudicat...
The Honourable J.J. Michel Robert, Chief Justice of Quebec (who has since retired), delivered the ke...
The Patriation Reference and Quebec Veto Reference revealed deep disagreements as to the nature of C...
Canadian reference questions allow the executive (both federal and provincial) to obtain an advisory...
It is accepted that Canada’s Constitution is almost impossible to amend, and that this amendment rig...
This annotated Coxford Lecture is the first account dedicated to tracing the part played in the 1980...
Canada in Question is an apt title for D. V. Smiley\u27s book discussing federalism in the seventies...
Recent American debates about the relationship between the historic political compromises underlying...
L'auteur évalue l'opération de rapatriement de la Constitution du Canada entreprise de 1980 à 1982. ...
The 30th anniversary of the Reference re Resolution to Amend the Constitution is an opportunity to r...
The Supreme Court’s decision in the Patriation Reference was a landmark in the jurisprudential analy...
The legacy of the Supreme Court’s decisions in the Patriation Reference and the Quebec Veto Referenc...
The Canadian constitution, also known as the British North America Act, 1867, has been patriated. ...
Commentators have suggested that the unsuccessful national referendum to ratify the 1992 Charlotteto...
Conventions are among the most important rules of the Canadian constitution. Yet orthodox legal theo...
This thesis seeks to identify the conceptual resources available to Canadian courts in the adjudicat...
The Honourable J.J. Michel Robert, Chief Justice of Quebec (who has since retired), delivered the ke...
The Patriation Reference and Quebec Veto Reference revealed deep disagreements as to the nature of C...
Canadian reference questions allow the executive (both federal and provincial) to obtain an advisory...
It is accepted that Canada’s Constitution is almost impossible to amend, and that this amendment rig...
This annotated Coxford Lecture is the first account dedicated to tracing the part played in the 1980...
Canada in Question is an apt title for D. V. Smiley\u27s book discussing federalism in the seventies...
Recent American debates about the relationship between the historic political compromises underlying...
L'auteur évalue l'opération de rapatriement de la Constitution du Canada entreprise de 1980 à 1982. ...