Add to ORKGDaubert v Frye: A State by State Comparison on Expert Qualification Witnesses are an integral part of any court case. One of the main types is the expert witness. In order for expert witnesses to have both their testimony and opinion entered into evidence, they must first meet a certain standard of admissibility. The federal courts use the Daubert test explicitly, while state courts have the option of using Daubert, or the older Frye test (some states use a hybrid of the two). This paper focuses on the history of the two main tests as well as compares how the expert witness qualification tests are used in New York and California (Frye), Texas and Michigan (Daubert), and Illinois and Georgia (hybrid)
Courts have fashioned various common law standards to determine the admissibility of nonscientific e...
In Daubert, the Supreme Court interpreted Federal Rule of Evidence 702 to permit an arguably more-re...
The last few decades have seen a dramatic shift in the admissibility of expert testimony in American...
When Justice Blackmun wrote Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, 509 U.S. 579 (1993), the assignm...
The Supreme Court’s trilogy of evidence cases, Daubert, Joiner, and Kumho Tire appear to mark a sign...
In Frye v. United States, the Court of Appeals of the District of Columbia affirmed a trial court\u2...
This article will look at the results of a survey conducted among Texas judges regarding their backg...
There is a generally accepted narrative about the development of the rules governing the admissibili...
The first section of this paper explains why assessing the worth of expert testimony poses special e...
The Supreme Court\u27s decision in Daubert clarified the standards for the admissibility of expert e...
The typical requisites for receiving testimony from an expert witness are that the expert be qualifi...
In the United States, Federal Rules of Evidence 702, the Frye and Daubert standards govern the admis...
Despite the establishment of the Daubert standard in 1993, the evidentiary criteria are rarely used ...
Nearly every treatment of scientific evidence begins with a faithful comparison between the Frye and...
In Sargon Enterprises, Inc. v. University of Southern California, the California Supreme Court decid...
Courts have fashioned various common law standards to determine the admissibility of nonscientific e...
In Daubert, the Supreme Court interpreted Federal Rule of Evidence 702 to permit an arguably more-re...
The last few decades have seen a dramatic shift in the admissibility of expert testimony in American...
When Justice Blackmun wrote Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, 509 U.S. 579 (1993), the assignm...
The Supreme Court’s trilogy of evidence cases, Daubert, Joiner, and Kumho Tire appear to mark a sign...
In Frye v. United States, the Court of Appeals of the District of Columbia affirmed a trial court\u2...
This article will look at the results of a survey conducted among Texas judges regarding their backg...
There is a generally accepted narrative about the development of the rules governing the admissibili...
The first section of this paper explains why assessing the worth of expert testimony poses special e...
The Supreme Court\u27s decision in Daubert clarified the standards for the admissibility of expert e...
The typical requisites for receiving testimony from an expert witness are that the expert be qualifi...
In the United States, Federal Rules of Evidence 702, the Frye and Daubert standards govern the admis...
Despite the establishment of the Daubert standard in 1993, the evidentiary criteria are rarely used ...
Nearly every treatment of scientific evidence begins with a faithful comparison between the Frye and...
In Sargon Enterprises, Inc. v. University of Southern California, the California Supreme Court decid...
Courts have fashioned various common law standards to determine the admissibility of nonscientific e...
In Daubert, the Supreme Court interpreted Federal Rule of Evidence 702 to permit an arguably more-re...
The last few decades have seen a dramatic shift in the admissibility of expert testimony in American...