This essay explores the feminist debates around gender difference and gender equality in the context of the Supreme Court of Canada\u27s Pelech trilogy. It argues that the Court\u27s approach to the enforcement of separation agreements does not adequately account for gender difference. Based on feminist critiques of difference, the essay then suggests an approach which might allow us to move beyond the dilemmas that difference presents to feminist legal theory and practice, and to the enforcement of separation agreements in particular
The question of how resources should be allocated between the sexes is an old one, and one that Cana...
Published in cooperation with the American Bar Association Section of Dispute Resolutio
The paper discusses a selection of important cases under section 15 of the Canadian Charter of Right...
This essay explores the feminist debates around gender difference and gender equality in the context...
Feminist writers have long engaged in critiques of private law. Surrogacy contracts or the “reasonab...
A married woman must take her husband\u27s domicile at common law. This rule exists in five of Canad...
A case comment on Quebec v. A. In Quebec v. A., the Supreme Court of Canada tackled a Charter challe...
Gender has always explicitly or implicitly played a critical role in contracting and in contracts op...
This article addresses the key elements of the public/private divide which predominates in western s...
Journal articleThe issue of personal choice has become central to Canadian family law. Much of the d...
This article reviews feminist critiques of same sex marriage and analyzes how marriage as a socio-le...
In this article, the author examines some of the critiques made and some of the aspirations raised i...
While it may be in questionable taste to begin an article on equality with a poem that uses man in...
This paper examines Dworkin\u27s interpretive theory of law from a feminist perspective, and asks wh...
The inauguration of the DUKE JOURNAL OF GENDER LAW & POLICY represents an exciting step in the insti...
The question of how resources should be allocated between the sexes is an old one, and one that Cana...
Published in cooperation with the American Bar Association Section of Dispute Resolutio
The paper discusses a selection of important cases under section 15 of the Canadian Charter of Right...
This essay explores the feminist debates around gender difference and gender equality in the context...
Feminist writers have long engaged in critiques of private law. Surrogacy contracts or the “reasonab...
A married woman must take her husband\u27s domicile at common law. This rule exists in five of Canad...
A case comment on Quebec v. A. In Quebec v. A., the Supreme Court of Canada tackled a Charter challe...
Gender has always explicitly or implicitly played a critical role in contracting and in contracts op...
This article addresses the key elements of the public/private divide which predominates in western s...
Journal articleThe issue of personal choice has become central to Canadian family law. Much of the d...
This article reviews feminist critiques of same sex marriage and analyzes how marriage as a socio-le...
In this article, the author examines some of the critiques made and some of the aspirations raised i...
While it may be in questionable taste to begin an article on equality with a poem that uses man in...
This paper examines Dworkin\u27s interpretive theory of law from a feminist perspective, and asks wh...
The inauguration of the DUKE JOURNAL OF GENDER LAW & POLICY represents an exciting step in the insti...
The question of how resources should be allocated between the sexes is an old one, and one that Cana...
Published in cooperation with the American Bar Association Section of Dispute Resolutio
The paper discusses a selection of important cases under section 15 of the Canadian Charter of Right...