Add to ORKGThe discussion in this paper elaborates a tiered set of reforms designed to (1) protect foreign investment, while (2) affording appropriate policy space for governments to develop and regulate their economies in a sustainable manner and (3) ensuring equitable governance of investment disputes such that foreign investors are not privileged, procedurally or substantively, over domestic investors and citizens. The paper includes a detailed appendix with proposed reforms to the NAFTA Chapter 11 text
To protect American investment abroad, the United States traditionally endorsed arbitration as the p...
The National Treatment Clause, Article 1102 of the North American Free Trade Agreement, protects for...
NAFTA: Compensating Business for the Inconvenience of Protecting Public Welfare? In the Wake of Sept...
The discussion in this paper elaborates a tiered set of reforms designed to (1) protect foreign inve...
Critics of NAFTA Chapter 11\u27s investor state dispute settlement mechanism are primarily concerned...
Many scholars argue that the rules, mechanisms and bodies established under the North American Free ...
The contentious NAFTA negotiations have yet to produce a concrete proposal for the investment chapte...
A multilateral framework on investment could provide an opportunity for a systematic review and refo...
This Article examines the growing opposition to arbitration of investor-state disputes involving cha...
Despite extensive arbitral practice interpreting investment treaty protections, serious shortcomings...
As states fiercely compete for international trade, there is growing concern about the emergence of ...
This paper discusses the way investor protections in international trade agreements may affect the d...
The North American Free Trade Agreement ( NAFTA ) entered into force in January 1994. For Mexico, th...
In this paper, the author will discuss some of the environmental issues surrounding two parts of the...
Investor-State Dispute Settlement (ISDS) is a standard component of most multilateral free-trade and...
To protect American investment abroad, the United States traditionally endorsed arbitration as the p...
The National Treatment Clause, Article 1102 of the North American Free Trade Agreement, protects for...
NAFTA: Compensating Business for the Inconvenience of Protecting Public Welfare? In the Wake of Sept...
The discussion in this paper elaborates a tiered set of reforms designed to (1) protect foreign inve...
Critics of NAFTA Chapter 11\u27s investor state dispute settlement mechanism are primarily concerned...
Many scholars argue that the rules, mechanisms and bodies established under the North American Free ...
The contentious NAFTA negotiations have yet to produce a concrete proposal for the investment chapte...
A multilateral framework on investment could provide an opportunity for a systematic review and refo...
This Article examines the growing opposition to arbitration of investor-state disputes involving cha...
Despite extensive arbitral practice interpreting investment treaty protections, serious shortcomings...
As states fiercely compete for international trade, there is growing concern about the emergence of ...
This paper discusses the way investor protections in international trade agreements may affect the d...
The North American Free Trade Agreement ( NAFTA ) entered into force in January 1994. For Mexico, th...
In this paper, the author will discuss some of the environmental issues surrounding two parts of the...
Investor-State Dispute Settlement (ISDS) is a standard component of most multilateral free-trade and...
To protect American investment abroad, the United States traditionally endorsed arbitration as the p...
The National Treatment Clause, Article 1102 of the North American Free Trade Agreement, protects for...
NAFTA: Compensating Business for the Inconvenience of Protecting Public Welfare? In the Wake of Sept...