Over the past several decades, the influence of the United States Constitution and Supreme Court around the world has waned while that of the Canadian Charter and Supreme Court has increased. This article examines several reasons for these changes, including: the relative ages of the constitutions; the US Supreme Court’s recent conservatism; the Canadian Supreme Court’s role in developing the doctrine of proportionality; the US Supreme Court’s interest in originalism; differing structures of constitutional review and judicial supremacy; and the two Courts’ relative openness to transnational influences
Competing theories regarding the development of a rights revolution in Canada have appeared in the...
Three high-profile government losses in the Supreme Court of Canada in late 2013 and early 2014, com...
In this article, the author discusses a course in Comparative Constitutional Jurisprudence that she ...
Over the past several decades, the influence of the United States Constitution and Supreme Court aro...
This article presents a statistical analysis of the first 352 Charter of Rights and Freedoms decisio...
This paper presents the annual review of the Supreme Court’s jurispru-dence for Osgoode Hall’s Annua...
Competing theories regarding the development of a “rights revolution” in Canada have appeared in the...
In its approach to defining “analogous grounds” for the purposes of subsection 15(1) of the Charter ...
This study presents a descriptive statistical analysis of the Supreme Court of Canada\u27s first one...
This article investigates whether Canada has changed in ways the ways that proponents of the Charter...
For those concerned about the democratic legitimacy of Charter review by Canadian courts, the idea o...
Since the enactment of the 1982 Charter of Rights and Freedoms, the Supreme Court of Canada has esta...
Since the adoption of the 1982 Charter of Rights and Freedoms (Charter), the Supreme Court of Canada...
This Article examines whether the global trend of codifying rights in entrenched bills accompanied b...
The adoption of the Charter of Rights in 1982 thrust a new role on the Supreme Court of Canada. The ...
Competing theories regarding the development of a rights revolution in Canada have appeared in the...
Three high-profile government losses in the Supreme Court of Canada in late 2013 and early 2014, com...
In this article, the author discusses a course in Comparative Constitutional Jurisprudence that she ...
Over the past several decades, the influence of the United States Constitution and Supreme Court aro...
This article presents a statistical analysis of the first 352 Charter of Rights and Freedoms decisio...
This paper presents the annual review of the Supreme Court’s jurispru-dence for Osgoode Hall’s Annua...
Competing theories regarding the development of a “rights revolution” in Canada have appeared in the...
In its approach to defining “analogous grounds” for the purposes of subsection 15(1) of the Charter ...
This study presents a descriptive statistical analysis of the Supreme Court of Canada\u27s first one...
This article investigates whether Canada has changed in ways the ways that proponents of the Charter...
For those concerned about the democratic legitimacy of Charter review by Canadian courts, the idea o...
Since the enactment of the 1982 Charter of Rights and Freedoms, the Supreme Court of Canada has esta...
Since the adoption of the 1982 Charter of Rights and Freedoms (Charter), the Supreme Court of Canada...
This Article examines whether the global trend of codifying rights in entrenched bills accompanied b...
The adoption of the Charter of Rights in 1982 thrust a new role on the Supreme Court of Canada. The ...
Competing theories regarding the development of a rights revolution in Canada have appeared in the...
Three high-profile government losses in the Supreme Court of Canada in late 2013 and early 2014, com...
In this article, the author discusses a course in Comparative Constitutional Jurisprudence that she ...