The authors empirically examine the challenge for cause process in the context of a murder trial in a rural region in southern Ontario. A survey was undertaken to assess prejudice in the community. This is the expected indicator of community prejudice and is compared to prejudice found in potential jurors. The study also compares the verdicts on each potential juror screened in the challenge for cause process, as rendered by the triers, defence counsel and a professional psychologist observing the procedure. The results of these studies are presented within
The jury system has been the center of our judicial system since the Bill of Rights guaranteed the r...
The proposed research examined the affective and cognitive processes involved in jurors’ reactions t...
In contrast to medical malpractice, legal malpractice is a phenomenon that has attracted little atte...
The authors empirically examine the challenge for cause process in the context of a murder trial in ...
grantor: University of TorontoThis study looks at jury selection in Canada by examining th...
This article presents a number of case studies involving pre- and mid-trial prejudice in criminal an...
As part of the jury selection process lawyers in Canada are permitted to exclude a significant numbe...
This study of individualized jury selection for 792 potentialjurors across 12 North Carolina capital...
The present study sought to examine the effect of four Instructions conditions (No Instructions, Rad...
One of the hallmarks of the American judicial system is the concept of trial by jury, and for said t...
The impact that the perceived violence of a crime has on jury decision making has received much cont...
Although proponents argue that peremptory challenges make juries more impartial by eliminating “extr...
In the United States, voir dire is viewed as essential to selecting an impartial jury. Judges, lawye...
Although the voir dire of jurors is one of the most significant mechanisms by which an impartial jur...
An integral part of the jury selection process is the individual challenge, where a party has the pr...
The jury system has been the center of our judicial system since the Bill of Rights guaranteed the r...
The proposed research examined the affective and cognitive processes involved in jurors’ reactions t...
In contrast to medical malpractice, legal malpractice is a phenomenon that has attracted little atte...
The authors empirically examine the challenge for cause process in the context of a murder trial in ...
grantor: University of TorontoThis study looks at jury selection in Canada by examining th...
This article presents a number of case studies involving pre- and mid-trial prejudice in criminal an...
As part of the jury selection process lawyers in Canada are permitted to exclude a significant numbe...
This study of individualized jury selection for 792 potentialjurors across 12 North Carolina capital...
The present study sought to examine the effect of four Instructions conditions (No Instructions, Rad...
One of the hallmarks of the American judicial system is the concept of trial by jury, and for said t...
The impact that the perceived violence of a crime has on jury decision making has received much cont...
Although proponents argue that peremptory challenges make juries more impartial by eliminating “extr...
In the United States, voir dire is viewed as essential to selecting an impartial jury. Judges, lawye...
Although the voir dire of jurors is one of the most significant mechanisms by which an impartial jur...
An integral part of the jury selection process is the individual challenge, where a party has the pr...
The jury system has been the center of our judicial system since the Bill of Rights guaranteed the r...
The proposed research examined the affective and cognitive processes involved in jurors’ reactions t...
In contrast to medical malpractice, legal malpractice is a phenomenon that has attracted little atte...