Add to ORKGThis symposium deals with the discipline and removal of Article III judges. In employing these measures we must heed two principles that are in tension with one another. The first is that judges must be honest. The second is that they must be independent. This second principle actually presupposes a third, about which I will say something before returning to the first two. The independence of federal judges is particularly important because they engage in the practice of judicial revie
Over the past several years, several high-profile complaints have been levied against Article III ju...
The contemporary conversation about judicial independence does not much attend to transformations in...
The independence of the judiciary is an enduring and defining objective of the legal profession. Law...
This symposium deals with the discipline and removal of Article III judges. In employing these measu...
In most of the states, judges of the appellate courts and of the trial courts of general jurisdictio...
The question of judicial accountability and independence arises primarily in the context of state co...
There may be no state interest more compelling than the independence, impartiality, and integrity of...
The Framers of the Constitution struggled to balance the independence of the federal judiciary with ...
In recent years, we have witnessed an unprecedented number of instances in which federal judges have...
The Framers argued judicial independence was necessary to the success of the American democratic exp...
It is well settled that independent courts play a vital role in promoting rule-of-law and separation...
Most lawyers and many citizens could recall the federal constitutional basis for judicial independen...
Currie outlines the development of the status of judges in England and in the US, with a brief refer...
I begin with a question: why have a conference on judicial independence? To find the answer, one nee...
This Article discusses judicial performance evaluations as a check on judicial independence. It cove...
Over the past several years, several high-profile complaints have been levied against Article III ju...
The contemporary conversation about judicial independence does not much attend to transformations in...
The independence of the judiciary is an enduring and defining objective of the legal profession. Law...
This symposium deals with the discipline and removal of Article III judges. In employing these measu...
In most of the states, judges of the appellate courts and of the trial courts of general jurisdictio...
The question of judicial accountability and independence arises primarily in the context of state co...
There may be no state interest more compelling than the independence, impartiality, and integrity of...
The Framers of the Constitution struggled to balance the independence of the federal judiciary with ...
In recent years, we have witnessed an unprecedented number of instances in which federal judges have...
The Framers argued judicial independence was necessary to the success of the American democratic exp...
It is well settled that independent courts play a vital role in promoting rule-of-law and separation...
Most lawyers and many citizens could recall the federal constitutional basis for judicial independen...
Currie outlines the development of the status of judges in England and in the US, with a brief refer...
I begin with a question: why have a conference on judicial independence? To find the answer, one nee...
This Article discusses judicial performance evaluations as a check on judicial independence. It cove...
Over the past several years, several high-profile complaints have been levied against Article III ju...
The contemporary conversation about judicial independence does not much attend to transformations in...
The independence of the judiciary is an enduring and defining objective of the legal profession. Law...