In one of his last opinions, Mr. Justice Harlan commented that interstate pollution cases were so complex that they might well be beyond the Supreme Court\u27s power to adjudicate. Such intimations, coming at a time when many claim the American court system is taxed to its capacity and when environmental litigation is allegedly skyrocketing, prompt the question of whether we need a new environmental court to handle cases in this specialized field
Justice Marshall served on the Court from 1967 until 1991. During that period, Congress passed all o...
Full-text available at SSRN. See link in this record.The proper role of the courts in our system of ...
In everyday discourse, the label environmental law signifies a distinct and unique area of the law...
In one of his last opinions, Mr. Justice Harlan commented that interstate pollution cases were so co...
In Section 9 of the Federal Water Pollution Control Act Amendments, Congress authorized a study of t...
Peer Reviewedhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/68756/2/10.1177_053901847000900501.pd
In my Garrison Lecture three years ago, I surveyed the environmental law decisions of the Supreme Co...
The proper role of the courts in our system of government has long been the source of considerable c...
During the October 2008 Term, the Supreme Court decided five cases that raised issues of environment...
In this Article, Professor Richard Lazarus examines the votes of the individual Justices who have de...
Part I of this article sets the stage with a brief survey of federal water pollution control, focusi...
1970 was a big year for environmental law. The first of the major federal environmental statutes, th...
The United States Supreme Court has ruled that the National Environmental Policy Act does not requir...
In the 2006 term the United States Supreme Court issued plenary decisions in four environmental case...
In American Electric Power v. Connecticut the Supreme Court confronted climate change litigation for...
Justice Marshall served on the Court from 1967 until 1991. During that period, Congress passed all o...
Full-text available at SSRN. See link in this record.The proper role of the courts in our system of ...
In everyday discourse, the label environmental law signifies a distinct and unique area of the law...
In one of his last opinions, Mr. Justice Harlan commented that interstate pollution cases were so co...
In Section 9 of the Federal Water Pollution Control Act Amendments, Congress authorized a study of t...
Peer Reviewedhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/68756/2/10.1177_053901847000900501.pd
In my Garrison Lecture three years ago, I surveyed the environmental law decisions of the Supreme Co...
The proper role of the courts in our system of government has long been the source of considerable c...
During the October 2008 Term, the Supreme Court decided five cases that raised issues of environment...
In this Article, Professor Richard Lazarus examines the votes of the individual Justices who have de...
Part I of this article sets the stage with a brief survey of federal water pollution control, focusi...
1970 was a big year for environmental law. The first of the major federal environmental statutes, th...
The United States Supreme Court has ruled that the National Environmental Policy Act does not requir...
In the 2006 term the United States Supreme Court issued plenary decisions in four environmental case...
In American Electric Power v. Connecticut the Supreme Court confronted climate change litigation for...
Justice Marshall served on the Court from 1967 until 1991. During that period, Congress passed all o...
Full-text available at SSRN. See link in this record.The proper role of the courts in our system of ...
In everyday discourse, the label environmental law signifies a distinct and unique area of the law...