Originally presented at the American Bar Association Conference on the Role of the Judge in the \u2780s, June 19-20, 1981, in Washington, D.C. For the reader\u27s convenience, annotations have been supplied by the staff of the Catholic University Law Review
In this Article, I advance a limited defense of judicial activism by the Burger and Rehnquist Courts...
On May 15, 2000, Chief Justice William Rehnquist, Writing on behalf of a majority of five, concluded...
From the moment the U.S. Supreme Court first confronted the difficult constitutional questions at ...
Originally presented at the American Bar Association Conference on the Role of the Judge in the \u2...
Part of Symposium: The Rehnquist Court in Empirical and Statistical Retrospectiv
Part of Symposium: The Rehnquist Court in Empirical and Statistical Retrospectiv
Judicial activism, writes Professor Kermit Roosevelt, of Penn, has been employed as an excessive a...
The author traces the common thread running through the analysis of judicial review by the symposium...
The term ―judicial activism has become a common part of modern American political speech, though it ...
Reviewing Government by Judiciary, by Raoul Berger: Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Massachuset...
The activist legacy of the New Deal Court was free-wheeling adjudication. It sprang from the Four Ho...
The Author examines the Supreme Court’s use of “preferential judicial activism”—whereby justices dec...
The date is misprinted as January 26, 1986.https://scholarship.law.gwu.edu/the_advocate_1987/1001/th...
The academic and political debate over judicial activism has been based on the overriding but patent...
In United States v. Lopez, the Supreme Court, for the first time in sixty years, declared an act of ...
In this Article, I advance a limited defense of judicial activism by the Burger and Rehnquist Courts...
On May 15, 2000, Chief Justice William Rehnquist, Writing on behalf of a majority of five, concluded...
From the moment the U.S. Supreme Court first confronted the difficult constitutional questions at ...
Originally presented at the American Bar Association Conference on the Role of the Judge in the \u2...
Part of Symposium: The Rehnquist Court in Empirical and Statistical Retrospectiv
Part of Symposium: The Rehnquist Court in Empirical and Statistical Retrospectiv
Judicial activism, writes Professor Kermit Roosevelt, of Penn, has been employed as an excessive a...
The author traces the common thread running through the analysis of judicial review by the symposium...
The term ―judicial activism has become a common part of modern American political speech, though it ...
Reviewing Government by Judiciary, by Raoul Berger: Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Massachuset...
The activist legacy of the New Deal Court was free-wheeling adjudication. It sprang from the Four Ho...
The Author examines the Supreme Court’s use of “preferential judicial activism”—whereby justices dec...
The date is misprinted as January 26, 1986.https://scholarship.law.gwu.edu/the_advocate_1987/1001/th...
The academic and political debate over judicial activism has been based on the overriding but patent...
In United States v. Lopez, the Supreme Court, for the first time in sixty years, declared an act of ...
In this Article, I advance a limited defense of judicial activism by the Burger and Rehnquist Courts...
On May 15, 2000, Chief Justice William Rehnquist, Writing on behalf of a majority of five, concluded...
From the moment the U.S. Supreme Court first confronted the difficult constitutional questions at ...