The productivity and performance of men is generally rated more highly than that of women in controlled experiments, suggesting conscious or unconscious gender biases in assessment. The degree to which editors and reviewers of scholarly journals exhibit gender biases that influence outcomes of the peer‐review process remains uncertain due to substantial variation among studies. We test whether gender predicts the outcomes of editorial and peer review for \u3e23,000 research manuscripts submitted to six journals in ecology and evolution from 2010 to 2015. Papers with female and male first authors were equally likely to be sent for peer review. However, papers with female first authors obtained, on average, slightly worse peer‐review scores a...
Despite substantial progress for women in science, women remain underrepresented in many aspects of ...
This article examines the impact of gender on researchers’ journal selection decisions, and thereby ...
Peer review is the primary method by which journals evaluate the quality and importance of scientifi...
The productivity and performance of men is generally rated more highly than that of women in control...
Despite substantial progress for women in science, women remain underrepresented in many aspects of ...
There is a widespread perception in the academic community that peer review is subject to many biase...
The loss of talented women from senior academic positions has partly resulted from a lower number of...
To date, the majority of authors on scientific publications have been men. While much of this gender...
The loss of talented women from senior academic positions has partly resulted from a lower number of...
Gender bias in the sciences is a prominent issue. Evidence suggests that more equal involvement of w...
This is the final version of the article. Available from the publisher via the DOI in this record.Th...
Lack of diversity on editorial boards might generate disparities in editorial and peer review that c...
This article examines gender bias in peer review with complete data on 145 journals in various field...
Gender bias is still unfortunately rife in the sciences, and men co-author most articles (> 7...
International audienceMale researchers dominate scientific production in science, technology, engine...
Despite substantial progress for women in science, women remain underrepresented in many aspects of ...
This article examines the impact of gender on researchers’ journal selection decisions, and thereby ...
Peer review is the primary method by which journals evaluate the quality and importance of scientifi...
The productivity and performance of men is generally rated more highly than that of women in control...
Despite substantial progress for women in science, women remain underrepresented in many aspects of ...
There is a widespread perception in the academic community that peer review is subject to many biase...
The loss of talented women from senior academic positions has partly resulted from a lower number of...
To date, the majority of authors on scientific publications have been men. While much of this gender...
The loss of talented women from senior academic positions has partly resulted from a lower number of...
Gender bias in the sciences is a prominent issue. Evidence suggests that more equal involvement of w...
This is the final version of the article. Available from the publisher via the DOI in this record.Th...
Lack of diversity on editorial boards might generate disparities in editorial and peer review that c...
This article examines gender bias in peer review with complete data on 145 journals in various field...
Gender bias is still unfortunately rife in the sciences, and men co-author most articles (> 7...
International audienceMale researchers dominate scientific production in science, technology, engine...
Despite substantial progress for women in science, women remain underrepresented in many aspects of ...
This article examines the impact of gender on researchers’ journal selection decisions, and thereby ...
Peer review is the primary method by which journals evaluate the quality and importance of scientifi...