In Lucas v. South Carolina Coastal Council, the United Supreme Court was forced once again to delve into the law of regulatory takings. This experience is seldom a pleasant one. Echoing the poet John Milton, an exasperated state court judge once described takings law as a “Serbonian Bog.” Unfortunately, the takings doctrine is only slightly more comprehensible after the Lucas decision than it was before. Nevertheless, progress in this area, however modest, deserves praise, and the Court is to be commended for clarifying one aspect of takings jurisprudence. As a result of Lucas a “categorical rule” has been announced that provides for compensation when a state regulation deprives a landowner of all economically valuable property use. The Art...
this thesis examines whether the current shoreline setback scheme provided for under the Massachuset...
Under the Beach and Shore Preservation Act, the State of Florida is authorized to conduct extraordin...
This Article addresses the need for a more binding Supreme Court decision precluding states from red...
In Lucas v. South Carolina Coastal Council, the United Supreme Court was forced once again to delve ...
This article argues that the Court\u27s reliance on the law of property neither creates an internal ...
It was not until the last day of the term, June 29, 1992, that the Court decided Lucas. By that time...
In Lucas v. South Carolina Coastal Council, the United States Supreme Court, in an opinion authored ...
Lucas v. South Carolina Coastal Council is one of several recent Supreme Court decisions in which th...
In Lucas v. South Carolina Coastal Council, the United States Supreme Court established a two-part t...
The United States Supreme Court held that land use regulations that deprive a landowner of all econo...
There is an increasingly powerful and vocal group coalescing in society today, sometimes described a...
In June 1992, the United States Supreme Court decided Lucas v. South Carolina Coastal Council. The c...
This article examines the seminal 1992 United States Supreme Court decision, Lucas v. South Carolina...
This article surveys the United States Supreme Court decision, Lucas v. South Carolina Coastal Commi...
The U.S. Supreme Court’s 1992 decision in Lucas v. South Carolina Coastal Council was celebrated by ...
this thesis examines whether the current shoreline setback scheme provided for under the Massachuset...
Under the Beach and Shore Preservation Act, the State of Florida is authorized to conduct extraordin...
This Article addresses the need for a more binding Supreme Court decision precluding states from red...
In Lucas v. South Carolina Coastal Council, the United Supreme Court was forced once again to delve ...
This article argues that the Court\u27s reliance on the law of property neither creates an internal ...
It was not until the last day of the term, June 29, 1992, that the Court decided Lucas. By that time...
In Lucas v. South Carolina Coastal Council, the United States Supreme Court, in an opinion authored ...
Lucas v. South Carolina Coastal Council is one of several recent Supreme Court decisions in which th...
In Lucas v. South Carolina Coastal Council, the United States Supreme Court established a two-part t...
The United States Supreme Court held that land use regulations that deprive a landowner of all econo...
There is an increasingly powerful and vocal group coalescing in society today, sometimes described a...
In June 1992, the United States Supreme Court decided Lucas v. South Carolina Coastal Council. The c...
This article examines the seminal 1992 United States Supreme Court decision, Lucas v. South Carolina...
This article surveys the United States Supreme Court decision, Lucas v. South Carolina Coastal Commi...
The U.S. Supreme Court’s 1992 decision in Lucas v. South Carolina Coastal Council was celebrated by ...
this thesis examines whether the current shoreline setback scheme provided for under the Massachuset...
Under the Beach and Shore Preservation Act, the State of Florida is authorized to conduct extraordin...
This Article addresses the need for a more binding Supreme Court decision precluding states from red...