In the wake of this uncertainty, this Note analyzes the proper scope of judicial review of consent decrees. The Note argues that to further the policies embodied in the APP A, courts should undertake intense review of proposed settlements before entering them as final judgments. Both the congressional intent in enacting the APP A and the public\u27s interest in effective enforcement of the antitrust laws support intense judicial review. The Note then demonstrates that the deferential standard that some courts have applied is derived mainly from a case that is inapplicable to the review of consent decrees. Finally, the Note argues that intense review will not entail any significant disadvantages
While recent decisions leave no doubt that the Court has revised its view concerning the purpose or ...
Judicial review of statutes on constitutional grounds is affected by a cluster of doctrinal practice...
The subject of this symposium is consent decrees, and I have been asked to think about judges and co...
In the wake of this uncertainty, this Note analyzes the proper scope of judicial review of consent d...
For nearly eighty years the Department of Justice has disposed of civil antitrust suits through sett...
This Note will attempt to determine the correct standard of review for all modifications of existing...
Several recent developments have shifted the attention of legal minds to an area of administrative l...
This Note argues that Congress should amend the APPA to require a judicial public interest determina...
This Note explores the Tunney Act’s mechanism for judicial review of consent decrees negotiated by t...
The presumption in favor of judicial review of agency action is a cornerstone of administrative law,...
In federal and state governments in the United States, administrative agencies are often given broad...
The genius of the Sherman Act has been said to lie in its generality and adaptability. Thus the act ...
(Excerpt) Part I provides background on finality, including an overview of the final judgment rule a...
There has been recent interest in rationalizing and codifying the opportunities for judicial review ...
I begin in Part I by describing the dynamics of the consent decree process: why parties want consent...
While recent decisions leave no doubt that the Court has revised its view concerning the purpose or ...
Judicial review of statutes on constitutional grounds is affected by a cluster of doctrinal practice...
The subject of this symposium is consent decrees, and I have been asked to think about judges and co...
In the wake of this uncertainty, this Note analyzes the proper scope of judicial review of consent d...
For nearly eighty years the Department of Justice has disposed of civil antitrust suits through sett...
This Note will attempt to determine the correct standard of review for all modifications of existing...
Several recent developments have shifted the attention of legal minds to an area of administrative l...
This Note argues that Congress should amend the APPA to require a judicial public interest determina...
This Note explores the Tunney Act’s mechanism for judicial review of consent decrees negotiated by t...
The presumption in favor of judicial review of agency action is a cornerstone of administrative law,...
In federal and state governments in the United States, administrative agencies are often given broad...
The genius of the Sherman Act has been said to lie in its generality and adaptability. Thus the act ...
(Excerpt) Part I provides background on finality, including an overview of the final judgment rule a...
There has been recent interest in rationalizing and codifying the opportunities for judicial review ...
I begin in Part I by describing the dynamics of the consent decree process: why parties want consent...
While recent decisions leave no doubt that the Court has revised its view concerning the purpose or ...
Judicial review of statutes on constitutional grounds is affected by a cluster of doctrinal practice...
The subject of this symposium is consent decrees, and I have been asked to think about judges and co...