Current rules in most U.S. jurisdictions prohibit judges from becoming involved in plea negotiations and limit the judges\u27 role to reviewing a plea bargain once it is presented by the parties. The enclosed article surveys three systems that provide for more significant judicial involvement - Germany, Florida, and Connecticut - and suggests that a judge\u27s early input into plea negotiations can render the final disposition more accurate and procedurally just. Based on interviews with practitioners and a review of the case law, the article outlines a model for greater judicial involvement in plea negotiations
The “anchoring effect” is a cognitive bias by which people evaluate numbers by focusing on a referen...
The German law on plea bargaining (Verständigungsgesetz) is unique in comparison to its counterparts...
In the past few decades, the role of judges has changed dramatically, yet its nature has remained la...
Current rules in most U.S. jurisdictions prohibit judges from becoming involved in plea negotiations...
The topic of judicial involvement in plea negotiations is a controversial issue, with potential bene...
The role of judges in processing criminal legal conflicts has changed dramatically in the past decad...
Plea bargaining in the United States is in critical respects unregulated, and a key reason is the ma...
This paper analyzes plea bargaining and plea negotiation in the American judicial system. Plea barga...
Plea bargaining is a well-established phenomenon in the United States, such that it is regarded even...
Over the years, criminal justice systems across the world have seen an unprecedented rise in the use...
This paper analyzes plea bargaining and plea negotiation in the American judicial system. Plea barga...
Plea bargaining has come to The Hague. For most of its existence, the International Criminal Tribuna...
In response to Rishi Raj Batra, Judicial Participation in Plea Bargaining: A Dispute Resolution Pers...
This article, the most comprehensive study of judicial participation in plea negotiations since the ...
The “anchoring effect” is a cognitive bias by which people evaluate numbers by focusing on a referen...
The “anchoring effect” is a cognitive bias by which people evaluate numbers by focusing on a referen...
The German law on plea bargaining (Verständigungsgesetz) is unique in comparison to its counterparts...
In the past few decades, the role of judges has changed dramatically, yet its nature has remained la...
Current rules in most U.S. jurisdictions prohibit judges from becoming involved in plea negotiations...
The topic of judicial involvement in plea negotiations is a controversial issue, with potential bene...
The role of judges in processing criminal legal conflicts has changed dramatically in the past decad...
Plea bargaining in the United States is in critical respects unregulated, and a key reason is the ma...
This paper analyzes plea bargaining and plea negotiation in the American judicial system. Plea barga...
Plea bargaining is a well-established phenomenon in the United States, such that it is regarded even...
Over the years, criminal justice systems across the world have seen an unprecedented rise in the use...
This paper analyzes plea bargaining and plea negotiation in the American judicial system. Plea barga...
Plea bargaining has come to The Hague. For most of its existence, the International Criminal Tribuna...
In response to Rishi Raj Batra, Judicial Participation in Plea Bargaining: A Dispute Resolution Pers...
This article, the most comprehensive study of judicial participation in plea negotiations since the ...
The “anchoring effect” is a cognitive bias by which people evaluate numbers by focusing on a referen...
The “anchoring effect” is a cognitive bias by which people evaluate numbers by focusing on a referen...
The German law on plea bargaining (Verständigungsgesetz) is unique in comparison to its counterparts...
In the past few decades, the role of judges has changed dramatically, yet its nature has remained la...