PCBs in the fish assemblage of a southern European estuary

The Mondego estuary fish assemblage was studied for the accumulation of PCBs. Three sampling stations were visited along an estuarine salinity gradient, and, in total, 15 species were collected. Analysis of PCBs revealed no significant differences among the sampling stations, although differences were observed among the fish assemblages. Fish assemblages could be divided into three groups. The first group comprised those with higher concentration (more than 10ngg-1, dw), included the species Gobius niger, Sardina pilchardus, Anguilla anguilla, Pomatoschistus microps, Chelidonichthys lucerna and Liza ramada; the second group with medium concentration (5-10ngg-1, dw), included the species Pomatoschistus minutus, Dicentrarchus labrax, Atherina presbyter, Chelon labrosus, Diplodus vulgaris, Platichthys flesus and Cilata mustela; and a third group with low concentration (less than 5ngg-1, dw), included the species Solea solea and Callionymus lyra. A positive correlation was found between lipid content and PCB concentrations. To evaluate the influence of the residence time of species on the accumulation of PCBs, species were divided into two groups: species that spend more than 3years in the estuary, and species that spend less than 3years in the estuary. Species that spend more than 3years in the estuary presented higher concentrations than species that spend less than 3years in the estuary. CBs 138 and 153 had higher concentration, and tended to increase with time spent in the estuary.The authors wish to thank all the colleagues that helped in the field and laboratory work. This work was supported by FCT (Fundação para a Ciência e Tecnologia) through a PhD grant attributed to J. Baptista (SFRH/BD/48262/2008), funded by Programa Operacional Potencial Humano of QREN Portugal and by the Portuguese budget through the Ministry of Science Technology and Education. P. Pato acknowledges a postdoctoral fellowship from FCT (SFRH/BPD/35068/2007). The authors, also, wish to thank the reviewers for their comments, which helped improve the manuscript.publishe