Add to ORKGThe Court determined that, under NRS 11.258(1), a complaint is only void if it is served without a concurrent filing of attorney affidavit and export report
NuVeda challenged the district court’s decision to deny the motion to transfer the contempt hearing ...
In an en banc decision, the Nevada Supreme Court considered an issue of first impression regarding N...
The Court determined that attorneys do not qualify as agents for the purposes of retaliatory action ...
The Court determined that when a complaint is filed with the Nevada State Board of Medical Examiners...
The Petitioners are estopped from filing their notice of voluntary dismissal under NRCP 41(a)(1)(A)(...
The Court held that an appellant who voluntarily dismisses a non-frivolous writ petition, after an a...
The Court affirmed the district court’s grant of summary judgment in favor of respondents, holding t...
In this case, the City of North Las Vegas’s complaint against the Appellee was not time-barred, did ...
The Court concluded dismissal is not proper under NRS 18.130(4) when a non-resident plaintiff files ...
The Court had two holdings in this case. First, a final decision for purposes of judicial review mus...
The Court determined that NRS 30.130, which concerns the Attorney General’s right to be notified and...
The Nevada Supreme Court considered a Petitioner home builder’s petition for writ relief and appeal ...
The Nevada Supreme Court dismissed an appeal from a district court order granting a petition for jud...
Appeal from an action that was dismissed on statute of limitation grounds with prejudice. The Court ...
The court considered consolidated appeals and a cross-appeal from a district court order granti...
NuVeda challenged the district court’s decision to deny the motion to transfer the contempt hearing ...
In an en banc decision, the Nevada Supreme Court considered an issue of first impression regarding N...
The Court determined that attorneys do not qualify as agents for the purposes of retaliatory action ...
The Court determined that when a complaint is filed with the Nevada State Board of Medical Examiners...
The Petitioners are estopped from filing their notice of voluntary dismissal under NRCP 41(a)(1)(A)(...
The Court held that an appellant who voluntarily dismisses a non-frivolous writ petition, after an a...
The Court affirmed the district court’s grant of summary judgment in favor of respondents, holding t...
In this case, the City of North Las Vegas’s complaint against the Appellee was not time-barred, did ...
The Court concluded dismissal is not proper under NRS 18.130(4) when a non-resident plaintiff files ...
The Court had two holdings in this case. First, a final decision for purposes of judicial review mus...
The Court determined that NRS 30.130, which concerns the Attorney General’s right to be notified and...
The Nevada Supreme Court considered a Petitioner home builder’s petition for writ relief and appeal ...
The Nevada Supreme Court dismissed an appeal from a district court order granting a petition for jud...
Appeal from an action that was dismissed on statute of limitation grounds with prejudice. The Court ...
The court considered consolidated appeals and a cross-appeal from a district court order granti...
NuVeda challenged the district court’s decision to deny the motion to transfer the contempt hearing ...
In an en banc decision, the Nevada Supreme Court considered an issue of first impression regarding N...
The Court determined that attorneys do not qualify as agents for the purposes of retaliatory action ...