In archival theory and practice, sentencing is the process of identifying and classifying information, potentially resulting in its destruction. It is a surprising homonym to judicial pronouncement of criminal punishment, despite the emotive association with censorship and book burning. In archival science, as in law, sentencing is the result of evaluative judgment. In the case of archival science, these judgments about historical and social value, institutional accountability and resourcing have a powerful impact on social memory because they determine which ‘creators, functions, and activities in society will be represented in archive
Section 718.2 (e)’s directive to canvass all available sanctions other than imprisonment that are re...
In Canada, recent decisions have reaffirmed the almost unfettered discretionary power of prosecutors...
This research explores the socio-legal activities of sentencing environmental offenders in Ontario. ...
In an increasingly litigious society, records and archives frequently become evidence in court. What...
In 2006, Victoria became the first state in Australia to enact laws specifically criminalizing docum...
In 2017, the Supreme Court of Canada affirmed a decision to destroy an archive of documents created ...
Society delegates responsibility for the selection and preservation of records of continuing value t...
Historically, legal records were the main focus of archival preservation, and archives served primar...
"Until the late 20th century, ‘an archive’ generally meant a repository for documents, as well as th...
This paper analyzes the negative impact that Canada’s criminal records regime has on sentencing judg...
This article considers the timeless legal and archival challenge to appraise, preserve, and referenc...
Sentencing in Canada has remained fairly consistent since formalized courts, at both the federal and...
The National Archives and Records Administration (NARA) is, wisely, planning the future of its enor...
This paper critically examines the potential of prisoner litigation in Canada to shed light on what ...
In this article Nigel Taylor aims to give an insight into how The National Archives is dealing with ...
Section 718.2 (e)’s directive to canvass all available sanctions other than imprisonment that are re...
In Canada, recent decisions have reaffirmed the almost unfettered discretionary power of prosecutors...
This research explores the socio-legal activities of sentencing environmental offenders in Ontario. ...
In an increasingly litigious society, records and archives frequently become evidence in court. What...
In 2006, Victoria became the first state in Australia to enact laws specifically criminalizing docum...
In 2017, the Supreme Court of Canada affirmed a decision to destroy an archive of documents created ...
Society delegates responsibility for the selection and preservation of records of continuing value t...
Historically, legal records were the main focus of archival preservation, and archives served primar...
"Until the late 20th century, ‘an archive’ generally meant a repository for documents, as well as th...
This paper analyzes the negative impact that Canada’s criminal records regime has on sentencing judg...
This article considers the timeless legal and archival challenge to appraise, preserve, and referenc...
Sentencing in Canada has remained fairly consistent since formalized courts, at both the federal and...
The National Archives and Records Administration (NARA) is, wisely, planning the future of its enor...
This paper critically examines the potential of prisoner litigation in Canada to shed light on what ...
In this article Nigel Taylor aims to give an insight into how The National Archives is dealing with ...
Section 718.2 (e)’s directive to canvass all available sanctions other than imprisonment that are re...
In Canada, recent decisions have reaffirmed the almost unfettered discretionary power of prosecutors...
This research explores the socio-legal activities of sentencing environmental offenders in Ontario. ...