Experiments on choice blindness support von Hippel & Trivers's (VH&T's) conception of the mind as fundamentally divided, but they also highlight a problem for VH&T's idea of non-conscious self-deception: If I try to trick you into believing that I have a certain preference, and the best way is to also trick myself, I might actually end up having that preference, at all levels of processing. © 2011 Cambridge University Press
In choice blindness (CB) experiments participants often accept a manipulated outcome as their actual...
A fundamental assumption of theories of decision-making is that we detect mismatches betwe...
Abstract: In this paper a new interactionistic model of mental causa-tion is developed. By analysing...
Abstract in Undetermined Experiments on choice blindness support von Hippel & Trivers's (VH&T's) con...
Experiments on choice blindness support von Hippel & Trivers's (VH&T's) conception of the mind as fu...
Our memory of past choices influences our future choices, yet is subject to error and manipulation. ...
The legacy of Nisbett and Wilson's classic article, Telling More Than We Can Know: Verbal Reports on...
Recent research has shown that we might not be as aware of our choices as we believe ourselves to be...
Many philosophers hold constitutive theories of self-knowledge in the sense that they think either t...
Recently the account of free will proposed by Harry Frankfurt has come under attack. It has been arg...
Recent work in cognitive science suggests that conscious thought plays a much less central role in t...
International audienceThe well-known experiments of Nisbett and Wilson lead to the conclusion that w...
The choice blindness phenomenon, or the inability to detect false feedback about personal preference...
Choice blindness is the finding that participants both often fail to notice mismatches between their...
Many philosophers have become sceptical of the use of thought experiments in theorising about person...
In choice blindness (CB) experiments participants often accept a manipulated outcome as their actual...
A fundamental assumption of theories of decision-making is that we detect mismatches betwe...
Abstract: In this paper a new interactionistic model of mental causa-tion is developed. By analysing...
Abstract in Undetermined Experiments on choice blindness support von Hippel & Trivers's (VH&T's) con...
Experiments on choice blindness support von Hippel & Trivers's (VH&T's) conception of the mind as fu...
Our memory of past choices influences our future choices, yet is subject to error and manipulation. ...
The legacy of Nisbett and Wilson's classic article, Telling More Than We Can Know: Verbal Reports on...
Recent research has shown that we might not be as aware of our choices as we believe ourselves to be...
Many philosophers hold constitutive theories of self-knowledge in the sense that they think either t...
Recently the account of free will proposed by Harry Frankfurt has come under attack. It has been arg...
Recent work in cognitive science suggests that conscious thought plays a much less central role in t...
International audienceThe well-known experiments of Nisbett and Wilson lead to the conclusion that w...
The choice blindness phenomenon, or the inability to detect false feedback about personal preference...
Choice blindness is the finding that participants both often fail to notice mismatches between their...
Many philosophers have become sceptical of the use of thought experiments in theorising about person...
In choice blindness (CB) experiments participants often accept a manipulated outcome as their actual...
A fundamental assumption of theories of decision-making is that we detect mismatches betwe...
Abstract: In this paper a new interactionistic model of mental causa-tion is developed. By analysing...